Timeline for Magnetic field due to a charge having uniform velocity
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
21 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 14, 2015 at 13:15 | comment | added | Agnivesh Singh | A bit delayed ,but could we break down the equations for time varying E fields and B fields in this case into a series of waves ,where each would be having a form like e^i(K.R. -Wt) using Fourier series ? Do they obey the Dirichlet's condition ? | |
| Mar 2, 2015 at 19:26 | comment | added | Sofia | @AgniveshSingh I really don't understand you. You read my answer to your question, the answer proves that although the e.m. field of a uniformly moving charge is time-dependent, it is not a propagating e.m. wave. The time dependence of an propagating e.m. wave is of the form $e^{i(\vec k \cdot \vec r - \omega t)}$. Look at my formulas $\text {(v)}$. Do you see such a thing? Do you see a wave propagating with the light velocity? | |
| Mar 2, 2015 at 19:11 | comment | added | Agnivesh Singh | Your first two statements in your answer are included in the "mentioned in link" question of mine and hence I thought you might have responded to it . Actually I was eager to know whether these waves have any involvement in the interaction of such particles and a greater curiosity to see if there can be any involvement of waves in electrostatic interactions and this arrangement did stir up expectations .So , I guess as of now we can conclude that a charge in uniform velocity also emits waves,right ? | |
| Mar 2, 2015 at 19:04 | comment | added | Sofia | @AgniveshSingh Two charges are a complication and I don't want to introduce a third one, i.e. more complication. | |
| Mar 2, 2015 at 19:02 | comment | added | Sofia | If an external factor makes them to move with constant velocity, then why do you need two charges? One single charge with constant movement is enough. When I advised you to place an additional question, it was about whether a charge in constant movement emits waves. It is a question that interests people in itself. | |
| Mar 2, 2015 at 18:55 | comment | added | Agnivesh Singh | Let's say an external source ensures that at each and every instant their velocities remain constant ,which is an assumption of my question . | |
| Mar 2, 2015 at 18:50 | comment | added | Sofia | I can't post this answer under the question with two charges moving, because they act on one another, s.t. they have an accelerated movement. | |
| Mar 2, 2015 at 18:49 | comment | added | Agnivesh Singh | physics.stackexchange.com/questions/167480/… | |
| Mar 2, 2015 at 18:47 | comment | added | Sofia | @AgniveshSingh what is the question where to you think that I should move my answer? Give me the site. | |
| Mar 2, 2015 at 18:45 | comment | added | Sofia | @AgniveshSingh "dragging the field"? Thank you for asking. I introduced more suitable words. Indeed the Coulomb field moves together with the charge, but since we have to express its dependence of coordinates in terms of the coordinates in $O'$ times dependence appears as requires the relativity. | |
| Mar 2, 2015 at 18:36 | history | edited | Sofia | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
clarifying a phrase in the answer, as requested
|
| Mar 2, 2015 at 18:24 | comment | added | Agnivesh Singh | :I guess you have posted your views on another question of mine under this question .Could you transfer it to there ? | |
| Mar 2, 2015 at 18:16 | comment | added | Agnivesh Singh | Could you tell me what do you mean by "dragging a field " ? | |
| Mar 1, 2015 at 12:50 | history | edited | Sofia | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
corrected a mistake, an omission of the power in some formulas
|
| Mar 1, 2015 at 12:44 | history | edited | Sofia | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
corrected a mistake, an omission of the power in some formulas
|
| Feb 28, 2015 at 22:08 | history | edited | Sofia | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added conclusive comments
|
| Feb 28, 2015 at 21:49 | history | edited | Sofia | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 26 characters in body
|
| Feb 28, 2015 at 21:42 | history | edited | Sofia | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 262 characters in body
|
| Feb 28, 2015 at 21:35 | history | edited | Sofia | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 262 characters in body
|
| Feb 28, 2015 at 20:35 | history | edited | Sofia | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 262 characters in body
|
| Feb 28, 2015 at 20:22 | history | answered | Sofia | CC BY-SA 3.0 |