Timeline for Why do nuclear weapons create a blast wave?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 6, 2015 at 16:13 | history | edited | AvidScifiReader | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 2 characters in body
|
| Apr 6, 2015 at 16:12 | vote | accept | AvidScifiReader | ||
| Feb 21, 2015 at 2:22 | answer | added | user22620 | timeline score: 0 | |
| Feb 21, 2015 at 2:22 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackPhysics/status/568958803959521281 | ||
| Feb 20, 2015 at 23:56 | comment | added | dmckee --- ex-moderator kitten | Related: physics.stackexchange.com/questions/133317/… | |
| Feb 20, 2015 at 20:59 | answer | added | Alan Rominger | timeline score: 4 | |
| Feb 20, 2015 at 20:57 | comment | added | Jim | But seriously, there's also gases from the primary device's detonators, plasma formed from the ablative casing of the secondary and the heated products of the primary's reaction, as well as all the gas from the structure of the device that has probably boiled and maybe even ionized. Nukes make lots of gas, they just don't make enough to have a noticeable difference on the blast wave | |
| Feb 20, 2015 at 20:53 | comment | added | Jim | I'd say nuclear bombs are the only kind that actually produce a gas. Fusion makes helium. Ergo, they make a gas. The others just turn something into a gas... less impressive | |
| Feb 20, 2015 at 20:52 | answer | added | CR Drost | timeline score: 2 | |
| Feb 20, 2015 at 20:30 | comment | added | Kyle Kanos | Closely related: physics.stackexchange.com/q/108971 | |
| Feb 20, 2015 at 20:25 | history | edited | Kyle Kanos | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added extra tags, minor spelling & regionalization
|
| Feb 20, 2015 at 20:22 | review | First posts | |||
| Feb 20, 2015 at 20:25 | |||||
| Feb 20, 2015 at 20:17 | history | asked | AvidScifiReader | CC BY-SA 3.0 |