Timeline for Is the Liénard-Wiechert electric field conservative?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 2015 at 1:53 | vote | accept | Sofia | ||
| Feb 2, 2015 at 1:56 | answer | added | Timaeus | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jan 31, 2015 at 15:02 | history | edited | Sofia | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 116 characters in body
|
| Jan 31, 2015 at 13:28 | history | edited | Sofia | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 64 characters in body
|
| Jan 31, 2015 at 7:04 | history | edited | Sofia | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 13 characters in body
|
| Jan 31, 2015 at 6:32 | history | edited | Sofia | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 13 characters in body
|
| Jan 30, 2015 at 18:16 | comment | added | glS | your (1) defines a conservative field (or rather, is one of the defining properties, like the integral one you wrote after). If you meant to ask if the energy is conserved in electromagnetic interactions in the general case (like in the Lienard-Wiechert potential) the answer is clearly yes, but this is not equivalent to the electromagnetic field being conservative | |
| Jan 30, 2015 at 16:23 | history | edited | Sofia | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 186 characters in body
|
| Jan 30, 2015 at 16:00 | answer | added | Paul | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jan 30, 2015 at 15:39 | history | asked | Sofia | CC BY-SA 3.0 |