Skip to main content
added 241 characters in body
Source Link
Skyler
  • 2k
  • 1
  • 15
  • 24

I have previously heard that some scientists are interested in trying to reformulate statistical mechanics in different ways to try and create new ways to solve novel problems.

This got me wondering, what are the fundamental "components" that you would need to re-derive to have a fully (or mostly) equivalent formulation of statistical mechanics? In essence, if you were to create a list of concepts, like the ergodic principle, partition function, quantum distributions, law of entropy, etc., what fundamental tools would you need to have in order to be able to derive many of the useful results of statistical mechanics, (for example the equipartition of energy, fermi/bose energies, the classical limit for gases)?

For example, we need the idea of discrete states, self-interference, the pauli exclusion principle, and some kind of energy relationship (like the hamiltonian) before we would be able to make ladder operators for the QM SHO, or derive it's energy levels.

To clarify, let's just say we were interested in constructing a tree graph of statistical mechanics in a way that was analogous to this outline of thermodynamics enter image description here

What would be the concepts the first "step" down on the tree for Statistical Mechanics?

I have previously heard that some scientists are interested in trying to reformulate statistical mechanics in different ways to try and create new ways to solve novel problems.

This got me wondering, what are the fundamental "components" that you would need to re-derive to have a fully (or mostly) equivalent formulation of statistical mechanics? In essence, if you were to create a list of concepts, like the ergodic principle, partition function, quantum distributions, law of entropy, etc., what fundamental tools would you need to have in order to be able to derive many of the useful results of statistical mechanics, (for example the equipartition of energy, fermi/bose energies, the classical limit for gases)?

For example,

To clarify, let's just say we were interested in constructing a tree graph of statistical mechanics in a way that was analogous to this outline of thermodynamics enter image description here

What would be the concepts the first "step" down on the tree for Statistical Mechanics?

I have previously heard that some scientists are interested in trying to reformulate statistical mechanics in different ways to try and create new ways to solve novel problems.

This got me wondering, what are the fundamental "components" that you would need to re-derive to have a fully (or mostly) equivalent formulation of statistical mechanics? In essence, if you were to create a list of concepts, like the ergodic principle, partition function, quantum distributions, law of entropy, etc., what fundamental tools would you need to have in order to be able to derive many of the useful results of statistical mechanics, (for example the equipartition of energy, fermi/bose energies, the classical limit for gases)?

For example, we need the idea of discrete states, self-interference, the pauli exclusion principle, and some kind of energy relationship (like the hamiltonian) before we would be able to make ladder operators for the QM SHO, or derive it's energy levels.

To clarify, let's just say we were interested in constructing a tree graph of statistical mechanics in a way that was analogous to this outline of thermodynamics enter image description here

What would be the concepts the first "step" down on the tree for Statistical Mechanics?

added 299 characters in body
Source Link
Skyler
  • 2k
  • 1
  • 15
  • 24

I have previously heard that some scientists are interested in trying to reformulate statistical mechanics in different ways to try and create new ways to solve novel problems.

This got me wondering, what are the fundamental "components" that you would need to re-derive to have a fully (or mostly) equivalent formulation of statistical mechanics? In essence, if you were to create a list of concepts, like the ergodic principle, partition function, thermodynamic identity, Boltzmann/quantumquantum distributions, law of entropy, etc., what fundamental tools would you need to have in order to be able to derive many of the useful results of statistical mechanics, (for example the equipartition of energy, fermi/bose energies, the classical limit for gases)?

Let'sFor example,

To clarify, let's just say we were to think aboutinterested in constructing a tree graph of statistical mechanics in a way similarthat was analogous to this outline of thermodynamics enter image description here

What would be the concepts the first "step" down on the tree for Statistical Mechanics?

I have previously heard that some scientists are interested in trying to reformulate statistical mechanics in different ways to try and create new ways to solve novel problems.

This got me wondering, what are the fundamental "components" that you would need to re-derive to have a fully (or mostly) equivalent formulation of statistical mechanics? In essence, if you were to create a list of concepts, like the partition function, thermodynamic identity, Boltzmann/quantum distributions, etc.

Let's say we were to think about statistical mechanics in a way similar to this outline of thermodynamics enter image description here

What would be the concepts the first "step" down on the tree for Statistical Mechanics?

I have previously heard that some scientists are interested in trying to reformulate statistical mechanics in different ways to try and create new ways to solve novel problems.

This got me wondering, what are the fundamental "components" that you would need to re-derive to have a fully (or mostly) equivalent formulation of statistical mechanics? In essence, if you were to create a list of concepts, like the ergodic principle, partition function, quantum distributions, law of entropy, etc., what fundamental tools would you need to have in order to be able to derive many of the useful results of statistical mechanics, (for example the equipartition of energy, fermi/bose energies, the classical limit for gases)?

For example,

To clarify, let's just say we were interested in constructing a tree graph of statistical mechanics in a way that was analogous to this outline of thermodynamics enter image description here

What would be the concepts the first "step" down on the tree for Statistical Mechanics?

Post Closed as "Needs details or clarity" by JamalS, Brandon Enright, Neuneck, Kyle Kanos, Jim
added 131 characters in body; edited title
Source Link
glS
  • 15.2k
  • 5
  • 41
  • 109

Fundamental "Axioms" What are the fundamental "axioms" of Statistical Mechanicsstatistical mechanics?

I have previously heard that some scientists are interested in trying to reformulate statistical mechanicsstatistical mechanics in different ways to try and create new ways to solve novel problems. 

This got me wondering, what are the fundamental "components" that you would need to re-derive to have a fully  (or mostly) equivalent formulation of statistical mechanics? In essence, if you were to create a list of concepts, like the partition function, thermodynamic identity, Boltzmann/quantum distributions, etc.

Let's say we were to think about Statistical Mechanicsstatistical mechanics in a way similar to this outline of Thermodynamicsthermodynamics enter image description here

What would be the concepts the first "step" down on the tree for Statistical Mechanics?

Fundamental "Axioms" of Statistical Mechanics

I have previously heard that some scientists are interested in trying to reformulate statistical mechanics in different ways to try and create new ways to solve novel problems. This got me wondering, what are the fundamental "components" that you would need to re-derive to have a fully(or mostly) equivalent formulation of statistical mechanics? In essence, if you were to create a list of concepts, like the partition function, thermodynamic identity, Boltzmann/quantum distributions, etc.

Let's say we were to think about Statistical Mechanics in a way similar to this outline of Thermodynamics enter image description here

What would be the concepts the first "step" down on the tree for Statistical Mechanics?

What are the fundamental "axioms" of statistical mechanics?

I have previously heard that some scientists are interested in trying to reformulate statistical mechanics in different ways to try and create new ways to solve novel problems. 

This got me wondering, what are the fundamental "components" that you would need to re-derive to have a fully  (or mostly) equivalent formulation of statistical mechanics? In essence, if you were to create a list of concepts, like the partition function, thermodynamic identity, Boltzmann/quantum distributions, etc.

Let's say we were to think about statistical mechanics in a way similar to this outline of thermodynamics enter image description here

What would be the concepts the first "step" down on the tree for Statistical Mechanics?

Source Link
Skyler
  • 2k
  • 1
  • 15
  • 24
Loading