Timeline for Lorentz-Transformation in a closed loop (Sagnac)
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
33 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 11, 2015 at 7:44 | comment | added | David Z | Just as a reminder, please don't make too many edits to any one post. | |
| Feb 7, 2015 at 6:25 | history | edited | Yukterez | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 2 characters in body
|
| Feb 4, 2015 at 19:14 | vote | accept | Yukterez | ||
| S Feb 4, 2015 at 19:14 | history | bounty ended | Yukterez | ||
| S Feb 4, 2015 at 19:14 | history | notice removed | Yukterez | ||
| Feb 4, 2015 at 17:10 | vote | accept | Yukterez | ||
| Feb 4, 2015 at 19:14 | |||||
| Feb 3, 2015 at 22:54 | answer | added | DanielLC | timeline score: 0 | |
| Feb 3, 2015 at 20:35 | vote | accept | Yukterez | ||
| Feb 3, 2015 at 20:36 | |||||
| Feb 3, 2015 at 18:47 | comment | added | sure | well, you don't necessarily do that's true, but i'm not sure that special relativity (with clock hypothesis) allows you to integrate the motion here (moreover its on smooth so) | |
| Feb 3, 2015 at 17:40 | comment | added | Yukterez | The right image shall not be a transformation, it just shows the system of the runner. The only reason why the runner is moving and the route is fixed is for better display on the monitor. If the runner (black point) were fixed in the animation, the route would move in the same way just in opposite directions. (It seems that the answear I'm refering to has been deleted while I'm typing my reply to it, so nevermind) | |
| Feb 3, 2015 at 16:16 | comment | added | Yukterez | @sure: You do not need general relativity to handle acceleration. In the absence of gravity special relativity should do. | |
| Feb 3, 2015 at 16:05 | comment | added | sure | if your runner changes direction, then he gets accelerated. If he gets accelerated, then the speed of light is no longer c (radar distance is not even symmetric for accelerated observer), and you need general relativity to compute exactly the path of a photon from an accelerated observer. | |
| Feb 3, 2015 at 10:34 | answer | added | Ruslan | timeline score: 7 | |
| Feb 3, 2015 at 6:15 | history | edited | Yukterez | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1 character in body
|
| Feb 3, 2015 at 6:10 | history | edited | Yukterez | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 103 characters in body
|
| Feb 3, 2015 at 6:04 | history | edited | Yukterez | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 103 characters in body
|
| Feb 3, 2015 at 5:56 | history | edited | Yukterez | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 191 characters in body
|
| Feb 3, 2015 at 5:45 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackPhysics/status/562487083072491522 | ||
| S Feb 3, 2015 at 4:43 | history | bounty started | Yukterez | ||
| S Feb 3, 2015 at 4:43 | history | notice added | Yukterez | Authoritative reference needed | |
| Jan 28, 2015 at 21:57 | history | edited | Yukterez | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
formatting
|
| Jan 28, 2015 at 20:05 | history | edited | Yukterez | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
| Jan 28, 2015 at 18:17 | history | edited | Yukterez | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 453 characters in body
|
| Jan 28, 2015 at 15:48 | history | edited | Yukterez | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
spelling error
|
| Jan 28, 2015 at 13:35 | history | edited | Yukterez | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 102 characters in body; edited title
|
| Jan 27, 2015 at 23:23 | history | edited | Yukterez | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
formatting
|
| Jan 27, 2015 at 22:43 | history | edited | Yukterez | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 12 characters in body
|
| Jan 27, 2015 at 22:13 | history | edited | HDE 226868 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Edited LaTeX.
|
| Jan 27, 2015 at 22:01 | history | edited | Yukterez | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 4 characters in body
|
| Jan 27, 2015 at 21:55 | history | edited | Yukterez | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 4 characters in body
|
| Jan 27, 2015 at 21:36 | history | edited | Yukterez | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 4 characters in body
|
| Jan 27, 2015 at 21:36 | comment | added | HDE 226868 | Here's the notation we use, LaTeX. | |
| Jan 27, 2015 at 21:30 | history | asked | Yukterez | CC BY-SA 3.0 |