Timeline for Can curvature waves in f(R) theories explain gravitational lensing in cluster collisions?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
13 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
S Jan 28, 2015 at 12:14 | history | bounty ended | Void | ||
S Jan 28, 2015 at 12:14 | history | notice removed | Void | ||
Jan 28, 2015 at 12:14 | vote | accept | Void | ||
Jan 28, 2015 at 4:09 | answer | added | Pointless | timeline score: 3 | |
Jan 27, 2015 at 21:31 | history | edited | Void | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 10 characters in body
|
Jan 25, 2015 at 16:28 | history | edited | Void | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
typo
|
S Jan 25, 2015 at 11:28 | history | bounty started | Void | ||
S Jan 25, 2015 at 11:28 | history | notice added | Void | Canonical answer required | |
Jan 25, 2015 at 11:23 | history | edited | Void | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
expanded and rewritten
|
Jan 17, 2015 at 14:05 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackPhysics/status/556452154421301248 | ||
Jan 17, 2015 at 13:57 | comment | added | Arthur Suvorov | The question then comes to: does the functional form for $f$ you found in order to explain the deflection properties match with other astrophysical bits of evidence as to the true theory of gravity? Hulse-Taylor pulsar, absence of gravitational waves, cosmology, black holes,... . The scalar freedom would mean objects emit dipole type radiation (as well as the usual quadrupolar gravitational radiation), which also has not been observed yet (phys.ufl.edu/ireu/IREU2012/pdf_reports/…). So the $f(R)$ scalar mode cannot be `too' strong. | |
Jan 17, 2015 at 13:55 | comment | added | Arthur Suvorov | As for the bullet cluster specifically, I can't comment. But certainly some work has gone into these kinds of thinking; see for instance this paper by Bohmer et al arxiv.org/abs/0709.0046v3. More generally, you can always think of any f(R) gravity as being a scalar-tensor (Brans-Dicke) theory by looking at conformal transformations (I know Salvatore Capozziello has some nice papers on this, which I cannot find specifically at the moment); the Brans-Dicke theory has a free parameter $\omega$ which molds light deflection. In short, I am sure the answer is a resounding 'yes' | |
Jan 17, 2015 at 8:27 | history | asked | Void | CC BY-SA 3.0 |