Timeline for Is a non-accelerating object far from a gravity source moving at the speed of light through time?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apr 18, 2015 at 0:52 | vote | accept | user3652621 | ||
Jan 12, 2015 at 16:57 | comment | added | John Rennie | @SerbanTanasa: I learned all this stuff decades ago (the ink was still wet on Albert's original paper) so I have no idea what would be a good modern introductory book on special relativity. I would just Google for suggestions. | |
Jan 12, 2015 at 16:47 | comment | added | user3652621 | what book would you suggest for a more in-depth study of this? Assume basic calculus and rusty linear algebra. | |
Jan 12, 2015 at 16:29 | comment | added | user3652621 | So a gravity well acts by essentially bending your future towards itself? Fascinating. Thanks for the answer! | |
Jan 12, 2015 at 16:25 | comment | added | John Rennie | @SerbanTanasa: the magnitude of $\vec{U}$ is conserved because it's always $c$. The direction of $\vec{U}$ will change as you accelerate. | |
Jan 12, 2015 at 16:22 | comment | added | user3652621 | Thanks! So my intuition was essentially correct, and $\vec{U}$ is the preserved unit? | |
Jan 12, 2015 at 16:18 | history | answered | John Rennie | CC BY-SA 3.0 |