Timeline for Reasons for decaying orbit for satellites and spacecrafts
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 21, 2017 at 13:56 | answer | added | Nik | timeline score: 0 | |
| Dec 23, 2014 at 22:08 | vote | accept | The New Horizon | ||
| Dec 23, 2014 at 10:08 | answer | added | user56903 | timeline score: 1 | |
| Dec 23, 2014 at 9:26 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ |
edited tags
|
|
| Dec 23, 2014 at 6:52 | history | edited | bobie | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 109 characters in body
|
| Dec 23, 2014 at 0:50 | answer | added | paul | timeline score: 4 | |
| Dec 23, 2014 at 0:15 | comment | added | CoilKid | I don't know if this is the reason, but the area where most satellites are, should still be in Earth's atmosphere. (Image from Wikipedia) and therefore, there are still a greater number of particles floating around than farther out. (Like interplanetary space). | |
| Dec 22, 2014 at 23:59 | comment | added | HDE 226868 | You may want to check out Space Exploration; I'm sure there are related questions there. It isn't a silly question, by the way. | |
| Dec 22, 2014 at 23:56 | review | First posts | |||
| Dec 22, 2014 at 23:59 | |||||
| Dec 22, 2014 at 23:56 | history | asked | The New Horizon | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
