Skip to main content
replaced http://physics.stackexchange.com/ with https://physics.stackexchange.com/
Source Link

I apologize, but QFT is not my domain. What I ask is connected with the question Do the fields exist without electric charges?Do the fields exist without electric charges? .

By analogy with the electron and proton, that carry the electric charges of the electrostatic field, could a neutron and anti-neutron represent the positive, respectively negative, charges of some field? I am sure that, if the answer is positive, the supposed field is not the gravitational one. In the gravitational field all the charges (masses) are positive.

I apologize, but QFT is not my domain. What I ask is connected with the question Do the fields exist without electric charges? .

By analogy with the electron and proton, that carry the electric charges of the electrostatic field, could a neutron and anti-neutron represent the positive, respectively negative, charges of some field? I am sure that, if the answer is positive, the supposed field is not the gravitational one. In the gravitational field all the charges (masses) are positive.

I apologize, but QFT is not my domain. What I ask is connected with the question Do the fields exist without electric charges? .

By analogy with the electron and proton, that carry the electric charges of the electrostatic field, could a neutron and anti-neutron represent the positive, respectively negative, charges of some field? I am sure that, if the answer is positive, the supposed field is not the gravitational one. In the gravitational field all the charges (masses) are positive.

deleted 48 characters in body; edited tags; edited title
Source Link
Qmechanic
  • 212.7k
  • 48
  • 589
  • 2.3k

Is there a field for which neutral particle and antiparticle  , can be considered as positive and negative charge?

I apologize, but QFT is not my domain. What I ask is connected with the question Do the fields exist without electric charges?Do the fields exist without electric charges? .

By analogy with the electron and proton, that carry the electric charges of the electrostatic field, could a neutron and anti-neutron represent the positive, respectively negative, charges of some field? I am sure that, if the answer is positive, the supposed field is not the gravitational one. In the gravitational field all the charges (masses) are positive.

Is there a field for which neutral particle and antiparticle  , can be considered as positive and negative charge?

I apologize, but QFT is not my domain. What I ask is connected with the question Do the fields exist without electric charges? .

By analogy with the electron and proton, that carry the charges of the electrostatic field, could a neutron and anti-neutron represent the positive, respectively negative, charges of some field? I am sure that, if the answer is positive, the supposed field is not the gravitational one. In the gravitational field all the charges (masses) are positive.

Is there a field for which neutral particle and antiparticle, can be considered as positive and negative charge?

I apologize, but QFT is not my domain. What I ask is connected with the question Do the fields exist without electric charges? .

By analogy with the electron and proton, that carry the electric charges of the electrostatic field, could a neutron and anti-neutron represent the positive, respectively negative, charges of some field? I am sure that, if the answer is positive, the supposed field is not the gravitational one. In the gravitational field all the charges (masses) are positive.

Source Link
Sofia
  • 6.9k
  • 3
  • 21
  • 38

Is there a field for which neutral particle and antiparticle , can be considered as positive and negative charge?

I apologize, but QFT is not my domain. What I ask is connected with the question Do the fields exist without electric charges? .

By analogy with the electron and proton, that carry the charges of the electrostatic field, could a neutron and anti-neutron represent the positive, respectively negative, charges of some field? I am sure that, if the answer is positive, the supposed field is not the gravitational one. In the gravitational field all the charges (masses) are positive.