Timeline for In the Pound-Rebka experiment, does light lose energy?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 25, 2014 at 22:51 | history | edited | HolgerFiedler | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Spelling
|
| Nov 30, 2014 at 16:01 | history | edited | HolgerFiedler | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
The link does not shown correct due to the minus?
|
| Nov 30, 2014 at 15:48 | history | edited | HolgerFiedler | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Sources and links
|
| Nov 30, 2014 at 14:00 | comment | added | Qmechanic♦ | Minor comment to the post (v1): Please consider to mention explicitly author, title, etc. of link, so it is possible to reconstruct link in case of link rot. | |
| Nov 30, 2014 at 9:18 | comment | added | HolgerFiedler | @Chris White: Yes. If possible correct my question, please. | |
| Nov 30, 2014 at 8:01 | comment | added | user10851 | I'm not too sure what the question is. Are you asking if the idea of continuously changing frequencies due to a continuously varying gravitational field, as hinted at in the first paragraph, should be discarded given the second paragraph? Or am I completely off the mark? | |
| Nov 30, 2014 at 7:43 | history | asked | HolgerFiedler | CC BY-SA 3.0 |