Timeline for Does Bell's inequalities also rule out non-computable local hidden variable theories?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 4, 2019 at 3:50 | review | Close votes | |||
| Jan 4, 2019 at 11:02 | |||||
| Jun 12, 2016 at 20:37 | history | edited | user65081 |
edited tags
|
|
| Dec 30, 2014 at 19:10 | vote | accept | CommunityBot | ||
| Dec 30, 2014 at 18:59 | answer | added | Hypnosifl | timeline score: 3 | |
| Dec 30, 2014 at 18:13 | comment | added | user65081 | @Hypnosifl so seemed to get it right! why dont you post it as a short answer, so I can approve it? | |
| Dec 30, 2014 at 18:04 | comment | added | Hypnosifl | Look at the toy model I gave of Bell inequality violations in this answer, involving pairs of scratch lotto cards sent to a pair of experimenters, and then think about whether it would make any difference to the analysis if the device printing up the "hidden fruits" in each pair of lotto cards could use a non-computable algorithm to do so. | |
| Dec 30, 2014 at 16:43 | history | edited | user65081 |
edited tags
|
|
| Nov 24, 2014 at 3:59 | history | edited | user65081 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 195 characters in body
|
| Nov 24, 2014 at 3:51 | history | edited | user65081 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1244 characters in body
|
| Nov 23, 2014 at 19:39 | answer | added | innisfree | timeline score: 1 | |
| Nov 23, 2014 at 19:14 | comment | added | innisfree | I'm a bit confused by the set-up here. Your toy theory is i) local and ii) sounds like it's counter-factual definite. You want to know whether you can evade Bell's inequalities (that permit i) OR ii) but not both), because of the microscopic details, here a non-computable process? | |
| Nov 23, 2014 at 18:57 | history | edited | user65081 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 5 characters in body
|
| Nov 23, 2014 at 18:47 | history | asked | user65081 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |