Timeline for Is radar cross section the same as scattering cross section?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
17 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 23, 2019 at 11:32 | answer | added | Bert Barrois | timeline score: 1 | |
| Apr 23, 2019 at 7:02 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Dec 21, 2018 at 11:02 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Nov 19, 2018 at 8:01 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Nov 2, 2018 at 12:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackPhysics/status/1058328010003279874 | ||
| Oct 19, 2018 at 12:00 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Sep 18, 2018 at 23:00 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Aug 16, 2018 at 10:01 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Jul 17, 2018 at 4:38 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Jun 16, 2018 at 23:23 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| May 11, 2018 at 16:12 | answer | added | denshion | timeline score: 1 | |
| Nov 23, 2014 at 5:22 | comment | added | user215721 | @user31748 Thank you! I think you could post these two comments as an answer, in order for me to accept it as answer. | |
| Nov 22, 2014 at 21:36 | comment | added | hyportnex | because scattering is direction dependent even in the case of a sphere. In radar this is called the "bi-static" cross section to distinguish it from the mono-static case. Mono-static: transmitter and receiver antenna are co-located, bi-static: transmitter and receiver antennas are at different locations. | |
| Nov 22, 2014 at 20:41 | history | edited | user215721 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 1 character in body
|
| Nov 22, 2014 at 19:56 | comment | added | user215721 | @user31748 But why radar cross section is given as a 3D farfield pattern, not a number (at each frequency)? (like antenna pattern) | |
| Nov 22, 2014 at 19:24 | comment | added | hyportnex | yes, radar cross section = scattering cross section | |
| Nov 22, 2014 at 15:23 | history | asked | user215721 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |