Timeline for What is the most efficient information storage?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4, 2014 at 5:32 | comment | added | user65081 | I might be wrong (I has been years since I haven't read in deep about this), but before you would be able to get to manipulate bits on a Planck scale level, your system will collapse into a black hole, that is why it is now days considered the ultimate limit. See the link in my answer for more details. | |
| Nov 4, 2014 at 4:47 | comment | added | Tyler | I guess if a plank length is the smallest you could store something and you had a 3D lattice of this something and the only states a slot can be are "full" or "empty", then that would impute a binary system. | |
| Nov 4, 2014 at 4:43 | comment | added | Tyler | But how much in a unit, one bit or more? One of the main reasons I'm asking this is i don't see why a limitation to two states would be inherent to the physics. And if it's not, then what's the limit? | |
| Nov 4, 2014 at 4:40 | history | answered | Thaina | CC BY-SA 3.0 |