Timeline for Do photons have relativistic mass?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 21, 2015 at 14:48 | answer | added | Peter M. Brown | timeline score: -4 | |
| Oct 14, 2014 at 12:37 | comment | added | garyp | The relevance to my comment (not answer) is that the OP is conducting research on photons, and Lamb's article provides a history of the concept. There's nothing kooky about his Anit-photon paper. As for your dismissal of his analysis of the photoelectric effect: not so fast. I don't know if Lamb was a kook or not, but in the two cases considered here, he is not. But I'm with you on one thing. It's easy to come up with a list of Nobel laureates who are kooks. | |
| Oct 14, 2014 at 3:17 | comment | added | user4552 | @garyp: Lamb was a Nobel Prize winner and also a kook. See physics.stackexchange.com/q/68147 . In any case, he has zero relevance here. | |
| Oct 12, 2014 at 0:39 | comment | added | garyp | If you are researching photons, I recommend this article by Nobel laureate Willis Lamb. It discusses the history of the photon concept, and the misconceptions around the concept. (Like Lamb, I avoid the use of the word as much as possible.) | |
| Oct 11, 2014 at 19:55 | answer | added | user4552 | timeline score: 17 | |
| Oct 11, 2014 at 19:40 | comment | added | CuriousOne | Did you look at the relativistic energy-momentum relationship?en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy%E2%80%93momentum_relation | |
| Oct 11, 2014 at 19:38 | review | First posts | |||
| Oct 11, 2014 at 19:55 | |||||
| Oct 11, 2014 at 19:37 | history | asked | Brendon Bruns | CC BY-SA 3.0 |