Timeline for What would happen if an accelerated particle collided with a person?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Oct 3, 2014 at 23:24 | history | suggested | Casey Jones | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
corrected English - I offer skype lessons, btw, in case you're interested
|
| Oct 3, 2014 at 23:18 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Oct 3, 2014 at 23:24 | |||||
| Oct 3, 2014 at 21:39 | comment | added | TaW | The last time I heard about radiation damages, there was agreemant that a high (singular or limited number of) energy damage is less dangerous, as it simply kills the cell whereas lower energy impacts are far more dangerous as they can change the DNA and create a cancerogeneous mutation. But that was in 1986.. | |
| Oct 2, 2014 at 13:00 | comment | added | Suzan Cioc | A question was about single particle. | |
| Oct 2, 2014 at 12:36 | comment | added | bizzehdee | In an LHC documentary, it was said that if the beam was to be aimed at a block of steal, it could bore a hole over 100 meters into that block. though i cannot find a reference to this to cite. | |
| Oct 1, 2014 at 13:47 | comment | added | Suzan Cioc |
Yes you are right, thanks. I was considering hadrons because LHC was mentioned.
|
|
| Oct 1, 2014 at 13:20 | comment | added | anna v | Please note that quite high energy muons do penetrate to sea level as the links in my answer show. | |
| Oct 1, 2014 at 10:58 | vote | accept | CommunityBot | ||
| Oct 1, 2014 at 10:52 | history | edited | Suzan Cioc | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 90 characters in body
|
| Oct 1, 2014 at 10:45 | history | answered | Suzan Cioc | CC BY-SA 3.0 |