Skip to main content
23 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Feb 27, 2017 at 16:14 comment added DanielSank Wrapping the He lines made a really big difference. Anyone reading this: go around your system and at each point, the system with the metal end of a screwdriver while touching the handle of the screwdriver to your skull. This will help you hear vibrations. You will find the noisiest points. Wrap these points in plastic tubing.
Apr 16, 2015 at 7:16 comment added DanielSank We are now somewhat convinced the sound actually travels through the helium lines. This isn't that surprising I suppose, given how the remote head works. We're going to try wrapping the lines in plastic tube. Will report back if/when it does/doesn't work.
Apr 16, 2015 at 7:15 history edited DanielSank CC BY-SA 3.0
Added question about transdution channel of the sound
Jan 1, 2015 at 17:31 vote accept DanielSank
Jan 1, 2015 at 17:31 history edited DanielSank CC BY-SA 3.0
deleted 12 characters in body
Sep 26, 2014 at 21:47 answer added NLambert timeline score: 3
Sep 22, 2014 at 0:14 history tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackPhysics/status/513843741375741954
Sep 14, 2014 at 15:08 history reopened Kyle Kanos
John Rennie
Floris
Danu
dmckee --- ex-moderator kitten
Sep 14, 2014 at 15:04 comment added Kyle Kanos Related meta post: meta.physics.stackexchange.com/questions/6135/…
Sep 14, 2014 at 9:43 comment added Danu I think this question was overly hastily closed. It's 100% on-topic as far as I'm concerned
Sep 13, 2014 at 23:54 review Reopen votes
Sep 14, 2014 at 15:09
Sep 13, 2014 at 23:32 comment added David Z I think this should not be closed, since it is pretty clearly about experimental physics - but I don't feel it would be appropriate for me to unilaterally reopen it. If a few other people did so first, I would definitely vote to reopen. In the meantime I wonder if another meta post would help matters...
Sep 13, 2014 at 21:43 comment added DanielSank @innisfree: Also, if there's doubt about whether or not to close, which there clearly is given your previous comment, shouldn't the benefit of the doubt should be given to the question?
Sep 13, 2014 at 21:41 comment added DanielSank @innisfree: I tried an Area 51 proposal for a dedicated low temperature physics site, but several folks are complaining that the types of questions proposed for it really should be asked here. I think a lot of people agree with this as evidenced by the existence of the experimental-technology tag! "Physics" does not mean "parts of physics which don't actually involve building things." The implied definition of "physics" expressed by voting to close this and similarly oriented questions is a constant source of displeasure for experimentalists. That should be enough of a reason to not close it.
Sep 13, 2014 at 21:37 comment added innisfree Well, on the one hand, this isn't a question about physics, but, on the other, you want a practical piece of information that only a physicist might have. I can see cases for and against closing.
Sep 13, 2014 at 21:30 comment added DanielSank @innisfree: Yes, it is about soundproofing a particular specialized type of equipment used only by experimental physicists. Suppose I were to ask about how to stabilize a laser; would that be accepted here? Given the links provided above by dmckee, I think closing this question doesn't make sense.
Sep 13, 2014 at 21:27 comment added innisfree I voted to close this question because I thought it was about soundproofing. Is it about soundproofing?
Sep 13, 2014 at 21:23 comment added dmckee --- ex-moderator kitten To be sure the question makes no particular reference to an experimental context, which may have something to do with people's decisions. I would just plead for a little more time taken on such decisions.
Sep 13, 2014 at 21:17 comment added innisfree @dmckee I will be the first to confess that I don't know ANYTHING about experimental cryogenic systems :S Maybe I was too hasty to recommend closing the Q
Sep 13, 2014 at 20:37 comment added dmckee --- ex-moderator kitten I am curious if any of the close voters know anything about experimental cryogenic systems? The usual set of meta posts apply: meta.physics.stackexchange.com/q/5553 meta.physics.stackexchange.com/q/2948 and meta.physics.stackexchange.com/a/4146/520.
Sep 13, 2014 at 18:02 history closed Brandon Enright
Bernhard
ACuriousMind
innisfree
Ali
Not suitable for this site
Sep 13, 2014 at 2:46 review Close votes
Sep 13, 2014 at 18:02
Sep 13, 2014 at 2:14 history asked DanielSank CC BY-SA 3.0