Skip to main content
Tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackPhysics/status/523645999533662208
added 6 characters in body
Source Link
JamalS
  • 19.5k
  • 6
  • 59
  • 107

The "almost" de Sitter expansion of current cosmological model implies a puzzle for SUSYsupersymmetry (SUSY) and also for string teeorytheory. A positive value of the cosmological constant implies a non-null vacuum energy that is, as far as I know, inconsistent with SUSY (SUSYwhich has to be broken in order to get a tiny -not huge!- cosmological constant. Moreover, interacting theories in de Sitter spacetimes are hard to handle in current string theory due to some issues concerning the S-matrix and that field strengths become imaginary in those spacetimes. My question is:

Is the currently accepted LCDM model of cosmology a challenge for SUSY/string theory? Wouldn't it be saying that SUSY and string theory are "wrong" or at least incomplete (or they will be, since we will approach a pure dS spacetime in the cosmological future it nothing changes)? Afterall, to my knowledge, de Sitter spacetimes are not well behaved in interacting field theories (andand thus, even in superstring M-theory!).

Remark: AdS/CFT is remarkably more "fit" to the SUSY/superstring idea, but it seems that the Universe has chosen the "wrong" sign for Lambda$\Lambda$!

The "almost" de Sitter expansion of current cosmological model implies a puzzle for SUSY and also for string teeory. A positive value of the cosmological constant implies a non-null vacuum energy that is, as far as I know, inconsistent with SUSY (SUSY has to be broken in order to get a tiny -not huge!- cosmological constant. Moreover, interacting theories in de Sitter spacetimes are hard to handle in current string theory due to some issues concerning the S-matrix and that field strengths become imaginary in those spacetimes. My question is:

Is the currently accepted LCDM model of cosmology a challenge for SUSY/string theory? Wouldn't it be saying that SUSY and string theory are "wrong" or at least incomplete (or they will be, since we will approach a pure dS spacetime in the cosmological future it nothing changes? Afterall, to my knowledge, de Sitter spacetimes are not well behaved in interacting field theories (and thus, even in superstring M-theory!)

Remark: AdS/CFT is remarkably more "fit" to the SUSY/superstring idea, but it seems that the Universe has chosen the "wrong" sign for Lambda!

The "almost" de Sitter expansion of current cosmological model implies a puzzle for supersymmetry (SUSY) and also for string theory. A positive value of the cosmological constant implies a non-null vacuum energy that is, as far as I know, inconsistent with SUSY which has to be broken in order to get a tiny cosmological constant. Moreover, interacting theories in de Sitter spacetimes are hard to handle in current string theory due to some issues concerning the S-matrix and that field strengths become imaginary in those spacetimes. My question is:

Is the currently accepted LCDM model of cosmology a challenge for SUSY/string theory? Wouldn't it be saying that SUSY and string theory are "wrong" or at least incomplete (or they will be, since we will approach a pure dS spacetime in the cosmological future it nothing changes)? Afterall, to my knowledge, de Sitter spacetimes are not well behaved in interacting field theories and thus, even in superstring M-theory.

Remark: AdS/CFT is remarkably more "fit" to the SUSY/superstring idea, but it seems that the Universe has chosen the "wrong" sign for $\Lambda$!

Source Link
riemannium
  • 6.7k
  • 5
  • 29
  • 60

Cosmological constant (positive, dS) as SUSY/supertring issue

The "almost" de Sitter expansion of current cosmological model implies a puzzle for SUSY and also for string teeory. A positive value of the cosmological constant implies a non-null vacuum energy that is, as far as I know, inconsistent with SUSY (SUSY has to be broken in order to get a tiny -not huge!- cosmological constant. Moreover, interacting theories in de Sitter spacetimes are hard to handle in current string theory due to some issues concerning the S-matrix and that field strengths become imaginary in those spacetimes. My question is:

Is the currently accepted LCDM model of cosmology a challenge for SUSY/string theory? Wouldn't it be saying that SUSY and string theory are "wrong" or at least incomplete (or they will be, since we will approach a pure dS spacetime in the cosmological future it nothing changes? Afterall, to my knowledge, de Sitter spacetimes are not well behaved in interacting field theories (and thus, even in superstring M-theory!)

Remark: AdS/CFT is remarkably more "fit" to the SUSY/superstring idea, but it seems that the Universe has chosen the "wrong" sign for Lambda!