Timeline for Why does product of Moduli and Diff x Weyl Variation vanish?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 2014 at 19:59 | vote | accept | sol0invictus | ||
| Aug 29, 2014 at 19:59 | vote | accept | sol0invictus | ||
| Aug 29, 2014 at 19:59 | |||||
| Aug 29, 2014 at 8:40 | comment | added | Trimok | @sol0invictus : It is, in some sense, the definition of the moduli, the moduli space (see $5.2.2$) is the "quotient" of space metrics by Diff Weyl redundancy. For instance, the quotient of $SO(4)$ by $SU(2)$ is $SU(2)$ because the two $SU(2)$ are "orthogonal" (independent). But the quotient of $S^3$ by $S^2$ is not $S^1$. There is a local fiber $S^1$, but it is not a global one, and there is not global $S^1$ and $S^2$ which are orthogonal. | |
| Aug 28, 2014 at 16:45 | comment | added | sol0invictus | Thanks for the clarification but is there any reason to take the space of moduli variation to be orthogonal ? | |
| Aug 28, 2014 at 12:28 | history | answered | Trimok | CC BY-SA 3.0 |