Skip to main content
edited title
Link
xiaohuamao
  • 3.8k
  • 21
  • 44

Why do people say "Bosons are either gapped or condensated, except physical principle protected cases (Goldstone boson, photon)."?

Tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackPhysics/status/510805735320465409
edited title
Source Link
xiaohuamao
  • 3.8k
  • 21
  • 44

Bosons are either gapped or condensated, except physical principle protected cases (Goldstone boson, photon, etc.). I read this in a paper (version1 of http://arxiv.org/abs/1404.3728v1, 1st page 1st column) and in other lecture slides (page 6 of http://discor2013.files.wordpress.com/2013/12/lee.pdf). This slide appears to talk about some mean field result of spin liquid state.

It'sThis statement is not really pertinent to the mainstream of that paper. But it sounds rather intriguing and necessary to be further clarified. So could anyone make it clearer? Thanks!

Bosons are either gapped or condensated, except physical principle protected cases (Goldstone boson, photon, etc.). I read this in a paper (version1 of http://arxiv.org/abs/1404.3728v1, 1st page 1st column) and other lecture slides (page 6 of http://discor2013.files.wordpress.com/2013/12/lee.pdf).

It's not really pertinent to the mainstream of that paper. But it sounds rather intriguing and necessary to be further clarified. So could anyone make it clearer? Thanks!

Bosons are either gapped or condensated, except physical principle protected cases (Goldstone boson, photon, etc.). I read this in a paper (version1 of http://arxiv.org/abs/1404.3728v1, 1st page 1st column) and in other lecture slides (page 6 of http://discor2013.files.wordpress.com/2013/12/lee.pdf). This slide appears to talk about some mean field result of spin liquid state.

This statement is not really pertinent to the mainstream of that paper. But it sounds rather intriguing and necessary to be further clarified. So could anyone make it clearer? Thanks!

edited title
Link
xiaohuamao
  • 3.8k
  • 21
  • 44

Bosons Why do people say "Bosons are either gapped or condensated, except physical principle protected cases (Goldstone boson, photon). Why"?

added 2 characters in body; edited title
Source Link
xiaohuamao
  • 3.8k
  • 21
  • 44
Loading
added 123 characters in body; added 18 characters in body
Source Link
xiaohuamao
  • 3.8k
  • 21
  • 44
Loading
added 4 characters in body
Source Link
xiaohuamao
  • 3.8k
  • 21
  • 44
Loading
Source Link
xiaohuamao
  • 3.8k
  • 21
  • 44
Loading