Timeline for Does this photograph portray double muon impact with nanogold atoms?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 30, 2014 at 12:10 | comment | added | rob♦ | Here is a chat link. | |
| Jul 30, 2014 at 11:38 | comment | added | Walter Kyle | Sure - how do we do that? TECHNIQUE: Modified (dual non-linear white light source) ellipsometric photography of “cloud” (undeveloped/latent silver converted by photons produced when TEM electrons generate SPRS upon impact with nanogold stained biological samples) remaining after development of TEMS. AgX gel (~12,500nm thick vs. Ilford nuclear emulsions @ 1-3 MIL/75,000nm) projects larger images on top gloss layer. Black in TEMS not ink but stacks of silver atoms. Atomic microbiology identifies “ion channels” in picometer range which electron beam impacts and may explain some collisions. | |
| Jul 30, 2014 at 2:24 | comment | added | rob♦ | Could we chat? | |
| Jul 30, 2014 at 2:14 | comment | added | Walter Kyle | I know its unusual and unreported but the legs are that small from the biological perspective...I could only explain what I was seeing with Feynman Diagrams in some cases and I saw resonances and googled it to find SPRS so if you could help explain some of these other Photos I would be very appreciative...I actualy see more than can capture due to auto focus | |
| Jul 30, 2014 at 1:39 | comment | added | rob♦ | If you really believe that you have 1 nm resolution then I don't understand your technique at all. Perhaps you have a more detailed explanation elsewhere that I could read? I have more questions than fit conveniently into this comment-box format. | |
| Jul 30, 2014 at 1:20 | comment | added | Walter Kyle | One photograph of a different formation has color in the areas of particle emissions that can be seen without enlargement it is faint .. the light and lens produces different images than seen here ... I also have what appears to be a particle collision which is black and white which I would be happy to have you critique | |
| Jul 30, 2014 at 0:03 | comment | added | Walter Kyle | really, the triangle legs are about 1nm wide x 100nm and the carpet fibers are smaller than that? the waves track to the areas of impact...being recorded on film the images are latent due to development time driven by electron photon production which is about 100000 times more efficient than light,,, the trick is the ellipsometric photography and this is consistent with particle emissions seen in many other phtographs | |
| Jul 29, 2014 at 23:47 | comment | added | Walter Kyle | oops hit return too soon... that is what caused the lines in the photo...the chandelier was actually an LED flashlight and if you look closely you can see the four layers of the photographic gel paper...its just a matter of how the light angles on the paper but was included to give some feeling for how the images appear... | |
| Jul 29, 2014 at 23:47 | comment | added | rob♦ | Oh, now I see. Yes, in your Photo 2 they look even more like fibers. | |
| Jul 29, 2014 at 23:42 | comment | added | Walter Kyle | Just to clarify - what you marked as photo e was my attempt to enlarge the area in my Photo 2 by taking a picture of Photo 2 on the screen of the computer. | |
| Jul 29, 2014 at 15:30 | history | edited | rob♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 9 characters in body
|
| Jul 29, 2014 at 13:35 | history | answered | rob♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |