Timeline for Divergence of a field and its interpretation
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:39 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://physics.stackexchange.com/ with https://physics.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Jul 14, 2014 at 15:19 | comment | added | Qmechanic♦ | For more on distributions, see e.g. math.stackexchange.com/q/285642/11127 | |
| Jul 14, 2014 at 11:35 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added explanation and footnote cf. comment by Ruslan
|
| Jul 14, 2014 at 7:06 | comment | added | Qmechanic♦ | It can be generalized to complex-valued $g$. I just didn't want to discuss issues like, say, $\infty-\infty$, to keep the answer short. | |
| Jul 14, 2014 at 5:44 | comment | added | Ruslan | Why should $g$ be necessarily non-negative? | |
| Jul 14, 2014 at 0:47 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Added explanation
|
| Jul 13, 2014 at 19:33 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 219 characters in body
|
| Jul 13, 2014 at 19:17 | comment | added | Qmechanic♦ | The Gaussian surface is arbitrary. | |
| Jul 13, 2014 at 19:15 | comment | added | Subhra | This is a very smart approach to bypass the problem. But what if the closed surface includes equal amount of positive and negative magnetic charges? | |
| Jul 13, 2014 at 19:14 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added explanation
|
| Jul 13, 2014 at 18:53 | history | answered | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |