Skip to main content
Question Unprotected by Buzz
Notice removed Reward existing answer by stafusa
Bounty Ended with DanielSank's answer chosen by stafusa
Notice added Reward existing answer by stafusa
Bounty Started worth 50 reputation by stafusa
deleted 172 characters in body; edited title
Source Link
knzhou
  • 105.1k
  • 24
  • 297
  • 494

Which What is more fundamental, fields or particles?

My confusion about quantum theory (beyond my obvious unfamiliarity with its terminology) is basically twofold:

  1. I lack an adequate understanding of how the mathematics of quantum theory is supposed to correspond to phenomena in the physical world
  2. I still have an incomplete picture in my mind of how cause and effect relationships occur at the quantum level of reality.

This is why phenomena such as "entanglement" make absolutely no sense to me. So, in an attempt to come to some understanding of all of this, I would like to know that if what we conceptualize as a "field" is merely an interaction among particles (bosons and fermions in the case of quantum fields), and particles (themselves)themselves are actually fluctuations in "fields", then which comes first in the hierarchy of cause and effect relationships, particles or "fields"fields?

Which is more fundamental, fields or particles

My confusion about quantum theory (beyond my obvious unfamiliarity with its terminology) is basically twofold:

  1. I lack an adequate understanding of how the mathematics of quantum theory is supposed to correspond to phenomena in the physical world
  2. I still have an incomplete picture in my mind of how cause and effect relationships occur at the quantum level of reality.

This is why phenomena such as "entanglement" make absolutely no sense to me. So, in an attempt to come to some understanding of all of this, I would like to know that if what we conceptualize as a "field" is merely an interaction among particles (bosons and fermions in the case of quantum fields), and particles (themselves) are actually fluctuations in "fields", then which comes first in the hierarchy of cause and effect relationships, particles or "fields"?

What is more fundamental, fields or particles?

My confusion about quantum theory is twofold:

  1. I lack an adequate understanding of how the mathematics of quantum theory is supposed to correspond to phenomena in the physical world
  2. I still have an incomplete picture in my mind of how cause and effect relationships occur at the quantum level of reality.

This is why phenomena such as "entanglement" make absolutely no sense to me. So, in an attempt to come to some understanding of all of this, I would like to know that if what we conceptualize as a "field" is merely an interaction among particles, and particles themselves are actually fluctuations in "fields", then which comes first, particles or fields?

title capitalization, remove irrelevance
Source Link
DanielSank
  • 25k
  • 7
  • 81
  • 115

Which is more fundamental, Fieldsfields or Particles?particles

I hope that I am using appropriate terminology. My confusion about quantum theory (beyond my obvious unfamiliarity with its terminology) is basically twofold:

  1. I lack an adequate understanding of how the mathematics of quantum theory is supposed to correspond to phenomena in the physical world
  2. I still have an incomplete picture in my mind of how cause and effect relationships occur at the quantum level of reality.

This is why phenomena such as "entanglement" make absolutely no sense to me. So, in an attempt to come to some understanding of all of this, I would like to know that if what we conceptualize as a "field" is merely an interaction among particles (bosons and fermions in the case of quantum fields), and particles (themselves) are actually fluctuations in "fields", then which comes first in the hierarchy of cause and effect relationships, particles or "fields"?

Which is more fundamental, Fields or Particles?

I hope that I am using appropriate terminology. My confusion about quantum theory (beyond my obvious unfamiliarity with its terminology) is basically twofold:

  1. I lack an adequate understanding of how the mathematics of quantum theory is supposed to correspond to phenomena in the physical world
  2. I still have an incomplete picture in my mind of how cause and effect relationships occur at the quantum level of reality.

This is why phenomena such as "entanglement" make absolutely no sense to me. So, in an attempt to come to some understanding of all of this, I would like to know that if what we conceptualize as a "field" is merely an interaction among particles (bosons and fermions in the case of quantum fields), and particles (themselves) are actually fluctuations in "fields", then which comes first in the hierarchy of cause and effect relationships, particles or "fields"?

Which is more fundamental, fields or particles

My confusion about quantum theory (beyond my obvious unfamiliarity with its terminology) is basically twofold:

  1. I lack an adequate understanding of how the mathematics of quantum theory is supposed to correspond to phenomena in the physical world
  2. I still have an incomplete picture in my mind of how cause and effect relationships occur at the quantum level of reality.

This is why phenomena such as "entanglement" make absolutely no sense to me. So, in an attempt to come to some understanding of all of this, I would like to know that if what we conceptualize as a "field" is merely an interaction among particles (bosons and fermions in the case of quantum fields), and particles (themselves) are actually fluctuations in "fields", then which comes first in the hierarchy of cause and effect relationships, particles or "fields"?

formatting
Source Link
Kyle Kanos
  • 28.8k
  • 41
  • 69
  • 135

Which Is More Fundamentalis more fundamental, Fields or Particles?

I hope that I am using appropriate terminology. My confusion about Quantum Theoryquantum theory (beyond my obvious unfamiliarity with its terminology) is basically twofold: 1) I lack an adequate understanding of how the mathematics of Quantum Theory is supposed to correspond to phenomena in the physical world, and 2) I still have an incomplete picture in my mind of how cause and effect relationships occur at the Quantum level of reality.

  1. I lack an adequate understanding of how the mathematics of quantum theory is supposed to correspond to phenomena in the physical world
  2. I still have an incomplete picture in my mind of how cause and effect relationships occur at the quantum level of reality.

This is why phenomena such as "entanglement" make absolutely no sense to me. So, in an attempt to come to some understanding of all of this, I would like to know that if what we conceptualize as a "field" is merely an interaction among particles (bosons and fermions in the case of Quantumquantum fields), and particles (themselves) are actually fluctuations in "fields", then which comes first in the hierarchy of cause and effect relationships, particles or "fields"?

Which Is More Fundamental, Fields or Particles?

I hope that I am using appropriate terminology. My confusion about Quantum Theory (beyond my obvious unfamiliarity with its terminology) is basically twofold: 1) I lack an adequate understanding of how the mathematics of Quantum Theory is supposed to correspond to phenomena in the physical world, and 2) I still have an incomplete picture in my mind of how cause and effect relationships occur at the Quantum level of reality. This is why phenomena such as "entanglement" make absolutely no sense to me. So, in an attempt to come to some understanding of all of this, I would like to know that if what we conceptualize as a "field" is merely an interaction among particles (bosons and fermions in the case of Quantum fields), and particles (themselves) are actually fluctuations in "fields", then which comes first in the hierarchy of cause and effect relationships, particles or "fields"?

Which is more fundamental, Fields or Particles?

I hope that I am using appropriate terminology. My confusion about quantum theory (beyond my obvious unfamiliarity with its terminology) is basically twofold:

  1. I lack an adequate understanding of how the mathematics of quantum theory is supposed to correspond to phenomena in the physical world
  2. I still have an incomplete picture in my mind of how cause and effect relationships occur at the quantum level of reality.

This is why phenomena such as "entanglement" make absolutely no sense to me. So, in an attempt to come to some understanding of all of this, I would like to know that if what we conceptualize as a "field" is merely an interaction among particles (bosons and fermions in the case of quantum fields), and particles (themselves) are actually fluctuations in "fields", then which comes first in the hierarchy of cause and effect relationships, particles or "fields"?

Question Protected by Qmechanic
Tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackPhysics/status/483882894772162561
Removed irrelevant apology in case the question is a duplicate.
Source Link
Loading
Edited tags + last sentence was unnecessary + everyone can see it is asked by John (removed that too)
Link
Brandon Enright
  • 12k
  • 17
  • 52
  • 78
Loading
Edited tags + last sentence was unnecessary + everyone can see it is asked by John (removed that too)
Source Link
Loading
improved formatting
Link
Loading
Source Link
Loading