Timeline for Choice of basis for Fujikawa method to derive chiral anomaly
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
13 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
S Jul 1, 2022 at 6:04 | history | bounty ended | CommunityBot | ||
S Jul 1, 2022 at 6:04 | history | notice removed | CommunityBot | ||
Jun 24, 2022 at 9:14 | answer | added | AccidentalFourierTransform | timeline score: 2 | |
Jun 23, 2022 at 6:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackPhysics/status/1539850742378516480 | ||
S Jun 23, 2022 at 4:20 | history | bounty started | Myridium | ||
S Jun 23, 2022 at 4:20 | history | notice added | Myridium | Improve details | |
Jul 4, 2014 at 11:16 | vote | accept | SubhamDC | ||
Jul 3, 2014 at 13:01 | answer | added | ACuriousMind♦ | timeline score: 9 | |
Jun 29, 2014 at 20:40 | comment | added | SubhamDC | yes. Why do we need eigenstates of the dirac operator to derive it? | |
Jun 28, 2014 at 13:21 | review | First posts | |||
Jun 28, 2014 at 13:45 | |||||
Jun 28, 2014 at 13:08 | comment | added | ACuriousMind♦ | What exactly do you want us to explain? How the Ward-Takahashi identity follows? Why we need eigenstates of the Dirac operator to derive it? Please be more specific (and tell us what part exactly you don't understand). | |
Jun 28, 2014 at 13:08 | history | edited | JamalS | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 11 characters in body; edited title
|
Jun 28, 2014 at 13:05 | history | asked | SubhamDC | CC BY-SA 3.0 |