Timeline for Why isn't the best case classical solution to the CHSH game 100%? [closed]
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
22 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 2014 at 20:10 | history | edited | Freudian Slip | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Attempted to explain what I was looking for in an answer so that people reading the question in the future would recognize what my actual mistake was
|
| Jun 25, 2014 at 3:04 | review | Reopen votes | |||
| Jun 25, 2014 at 15:47 | |||||
| Jun 19, 2014 at 20:57 | comment | added | Frédéric Grosshans | @DavidZ I feel strongly about it, so I posted a question on meta. | |
| Jun 17, 2014 at 17:43 | review | Reopen votes | |||
| Jun 17, 2014 at 18:44 | |||||
| Jun 17, 2014 at 17:28 | history | edited | Freudian Slip | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Added clarification for why this belongs in Physics instead of something like Game Theory.
|
| Jun 17, 2014 at 17:10 | comment | added | David Z | @Nathaniel I would respond that the idea that the guiding principle for on-topicness here should be anything other than "about physics" is ridiculous. Though it's counterproductive to use words like "ridiculous" because clearly what is ridiculous to one person is not to another. Anyway, let's not get into this further here. Maybe on Physics Meta, if you feel strongly enough about it. | |
| Jun 17, 2014 at 17:06 | vote | accept | Freudian Slip | ||
| Jun 17, 2014 at 16:59 | vote | accept | Freudian Slip | ||
| Jun 17, 2014 at 17:06 | |||||
| Jun 17, 2014 at 15:56 | history | closed |
Brandon Enright John Rennie DavePhD Danu Kyle Kanos |
Not suitable for this site | |
| Jun 17, 2014 at 9:09 | comment | added | Frédéric Grosshans | The CHSH game has been invented by physicists to study a physics question (nonlocality). If you don't like to speak about games, call it the CHSH thought experiment! | |
| Jun 17, 2014 at 7:43 | comment | added | N. Virgo | This is getting silly. How can a question about the CHSH game be off topic on a physics site? The idea that questions have to be "about physics" has always been a bit flaky (i.e. blatantly subjective), but if you're going to draw the line here it's just ridiculous. | |
| Jun 17, 2014 at 7:05 | comment | added | Brandon Enright | This question appears to be off-topic because it is about game strategy. | |
| Jun 17, 2014 at 6:16 | review | Close votes | |||
| Jun 17, 2014 at 15:56 | |||||
| Jun 17, 2014 at 6:01 | answer | added | David J. | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jun 17, 2014 at 1:07 | comment | added | Freudian Slip | Good point. I was unclear in what I was expecting as an answer. Ultimately, I was looking for the part of Bell's inequality or the CHSH game that was was missing from my "executive summary" of the CHSH game that prevented my "obvious" (and completely flawed) counter-example from being considered as the best-case classical solution. The fact that the answer turned out to have nothing to do with physics and was just "there actually is a lose condition and you just didn't see it" is purely accidental. | |
| Jun 17, 2014 at 0:56 | review | First posts | |||
| Jun 17, 2014 at 1:01 | |||||
| Jun 17, 2014 at 0:56 | comment | added | David Z | Bell's inequality has to do with physics, yes, but the question you're asking has nothing to do with Bell's inequality or quantum mechanics at all. It's purely a logic puzzle. (You could remove all references to QM from this question without changing what it's asking.) | |
| Jun 17, 2014 at 0:54 | comment | added | Freudian Slip | Nope, it still belongs in Physics - the assumption is that the original theory (I think it's "Bell's Inequality") contained some qualifying assumptions and/or conditions to the game that were missing in the summary I had read to exclude the possibility that I had raised. | |
| Jun 17, 2014 at 0:53 | history | edited | Freudian Slip | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 97 characters in body
|
| Jun 17, 2014 at 0:52 | answer | added | David Z | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jun 17, 2014 at 0:48 | comment | added | David Z | Good question, but it doesn't actually have anything to do with physics since you're just asking about the classical game. We can migrate this question to another site where it would be more appropriate (so don't repost it elsewhere). | |
| Jun 17, 2014 at 0:39 | history | asked | Freudian Slip | CC BY-SA 3.0 |