Skip to main content
13 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Aug 28, 2013 at 6:09 answer added user4552 timeline score: 1
Mar 17, 2013 at 21:43 history protected Qmechanic
Jan 23, 2013 at 17:16 vote accept Alan Rominger
Jul 19, 2011 at 14:22 history bounty ended CommunityBot
Jul 11, 2011 at 14:00 history bounty started Alan Rominger
Jul 7, 2011 at 17:57 answer added Scott Carnahan timeline score: 2
Jul 6, 2011 at 21:04 answer added Andrew Spott timeline score: 1
Jul 5, 2011 at 22:25 comment added Benjamin Horowitz An interesting option is using a solar sail on the spacecraft, which can either be powered by the sun, or an earth directed laser. Both options would probably accelerate pretty slowly, and not get up to relativistic speeds until they were "out of range" of the earth laser/sun.
Jul 5, 2011 at 21:26 history tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackPhysics/status/88358090138845184
Jul 5, 2011 at 19:05 comment added Alan Rominger @lurscher My intent is that a negative answer to this question results in a sci-fi conclusion of "guess we're stuck with suspended animation". It's certainly debatable as to whether or not time travel to the future is of utility in the first place. Also, since I'm allowing a "large" stationary reference frame, propellent-less travel is already possible, consider the case of protons in the LHC. Only problem is that the required energy is >>mc^2 still.
Jul 5, 2011 at 18:49 comment added lurscher i don't think people have studied space-time swimming (propellent-less movement) enough to discard it as a potential mechanism for space travel, they just know so far is that in some sample arrangements, the displacements are tiny, really tiny: physics.stackexchange.com/questions/886/…
Jul 5, 2011 at 18:33 comment added lurscher i take you don't consider hibernation/ suspensed animation a valid alternative
Jul 5, 2011 at 18:29 history asked Alan Rominger CC BY-SA 3.0