Skip to main content
Bumped by Community user
Bumped by Community user
Bumped by Community user
Bumped by Community user
Bumped by Community user
Bumped by Community user
Bumped by Community user
edited tags
Link
Qmechanic
  • 213.1k
  • 48
  • 590
  • 2.3k
Bumped by Community user
Bumped by Community user
Source Link
Carlos
  • 4.6k
  • 6
  • 36
  • 55

Difference between action-at-a-distance and a field according to Maxwell?

My question is more on a historical note that involves Maxwell’s equations. Besides the information that I have obtained from textbooks, I am mainly getting it from History of Maxwell's Equations and was not able to find or understand the question below.

I first started thinking about this last semester while tutoring a mechanics student who believed that action-at-a-distance was a correct way of thinking about gravitational interactions between two objects. I explained to this student that the “correct” interpretation was the idea of a “field.” And it was here that I stated asking myself how did Maxwell know he was on the right track in developing the field idea from Faraday’s work? From my readings, I believe that I understand that he first developed his mechanical analog with an imaginary weightless and incompressible fluid flowing (where the stream lines are the electric and magnetic field lines) through a porous medium to reach his conclusions.

It seems to me that at an electromagnetic boundary, the action-at-a-distance theory would not be able to account for boundary conditions (in post Maxwellian language) established by a field. Even though I typically think of boundary conditions when referring to electromagnetic wave propagation across a boundary, I feel that somehow Maxwell “knew” this before he developed the electromagnetic wave equation and its associated boundary conditions:

$$ϵ_1E^{\bot}_1=ϵ_2E^{\bot}_2; {\;} {\;} E^{\parallel}_1=E^{\parallel}_2;{\;} {\;} B^{\bot}_1=B^{\bot}_2; {\;} {\;} \frac{B^{\parallel}_1}{{\mu}_1}=\frac{B^{\parallel}_2}{{\mu}_2}$$

I would appreciate someone giving me insight on this historical question or setting me straight on were I got it wrong.