Timeline for Decoupling of Holomorphic and Anti-holomorphic parts in 2D CFT
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:57 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
|
|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:39 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://physics.stackexchange.com/ with https://physics.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Jun 7, 2014 at 17:10 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Added explanation
|
| Jun 6, 2014 at 16:31 | comment | added | user7757 | Thanks for your answer. The point I am trying to take is the holomorphic and the anti-holomorphic sectors are identical in every aspect, so I am puzzled how working with just one variable gives you the whole answer. Just replace $z$ by $\bar{z}$ and $h$ by $\bar{h}$. I am trying to think of this as writing a coupled system in 2D into normal modes, but the two normal modes are physically distinguishable, but here there is no such thing, as the hilbert spaces seem to be isomorphic. | |
| Jun 6, 2014 at 16:18 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Added explanation
|
| Jun 5, 2014 at 15:25 | history | answered | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |