Timeline for Energy in nuclear decays
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 24, 2020 at 21:39 | history | edited | hb20007 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Grammatical fixes
|
| May 11, 2014 at 6:35 | vote | accept | hb20007 | ||
| May 10, 2014 at 19:46 | comment | added | hb20007 | @dmckee oh, I think you're right then | |
| May 10, 2014 at 18:49 | answer | added | rob♦ | timeline score: 1 | |
| May 10, 2014 at 18:29 | comment | added | dmckee --- ex-moderator kitten | If you examine the situation in the rest frame of the progenitor, then it should be absolutely clear that the kinetic energies can't be the same. From that I would conclude that the question is asking you about all the energy contributions, including the masses. | |
| May 10, 2014 at 17:53 | comment | added | hb20007 | @dmckee yes, particularly in whether the last statement I quoted is true/false | |
| May 10, 2014 at 17:49 | comment | added | dmckee --- ex-moderator kitten | Particle physicists do tend to include mass in "energy" most (but not quite all) of the time. But I can take it that you are interested in the relationship between the pre- and post-decay kinetic energies, no? | |
| May 10, 2014 at 11:26 | history | asked | hb20007 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |