Skip to main content
edited tags
Link
Qmechanic
  • 213.1k
  • 48
  • 590
  • 2.3k
added 53 characters in body; edited tags
Source Link
Qmechanic
  • 213.1k
  • 48
  • 590
  • 2.3k

I read on Wiki that Earnshaw's theoremEarnshaw's theorem has been proven for extended conducting bodies. If we consider the case of a positive charge at the centre of a symmetric metal cavity- the positive charge and the induced negative charge constitute a system which violates Earnshaw's law.

Where am I wrong in thinking this way?

I read on Wiki that Earnshaw's theorem has been proven for extended conducting bodies. If we consider the case of a positive charge at the centre of a symmetric metal cavity- the positive charge and the induced negative charge constitute a system which violates Earnshaw's law.

Where am I wrong in thinking this way?

I read on Wiki that Earnshaw's theorem has been proven for extended conducting bodies. If we consider the case of a positive charge at the centre of a symmetric metal cavity- the positive charge and the induced negative charge constitute a system which violates Earnshaw's law.

Where am I wrong in thinking this way?

added 121 characters in body
Source Link

I read on Wiki that Earnshaw's theorem has been proven for extended conducting bodies. If we consider the case of a positive charge at the centre of a symmetric metal cavity- the positive charge and the induced negative charge constitute a system which violates Earnshaw's law.

Where am I wrong in thinking this way?

I read on Wiki that Earnshaw's theorem has been proven for extended conducting bodies. If we consider the case of a positive charge at the centre of a symmetric metal cavity- the positive charge and the induced negative charge constitute a system which violates Earnshaw's law.

Where am I wrong in thinking this way?

I read on Wiki that Earnshaw's theorem has been proven for extended conducting bodies. If we consider the case of a positive charge at the centre of a symmetric metal cavity- the positive charge and the induced negative charge constitute a system which violates Earnshaw's law.

Where am I wrong in thinking this way?

Source Link
Loading