Skip to main content
11 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jul 6, 2011 at 13:34 comment added Qmechanic Time and space are not on equal footing in non-relativistic quantum mechanics. If we for simplicity consider a particle with position $\vec{x}\in\mathbb{R}^3$, it is well-known that the Hilbert space of wave functions is isomorphic to $L^2(\mathbb{R}^3)$. The Hilbert space is not isomorphic to $L^2(\mathbb{R}^4)$, basically because temporal evolution of the wave function is not arbitrary but completely determined by the time-dependent Schroedinger equation.
Jun 18, 2011 at 17:31 comment added lurscher phase and action are one and the same thing (modulus a $\hbar$ constant to make the action adimensional); the phase of a classical path is the integral of the lagrangian of the path, which is also the classical action. What do you want to achieve?
Jun 18, 2011 at 13:43 comment added Qmechanic Dear @metzgeer: What the PRL article seems to mean by "time reversal" is that the authors are able to take an arbitrary wave package smaller than approximately 30 $\mu m$ in size, and make it travel with its rear end first. As far as I can tell everything appears to be within the realm of standard physics where time is a parameter.
Jun 16, 2011 at 13:07 answer added Peter Morgan timeline score: 3
Jun 16, 2011 at 12:12 comment added Qmechanic The PRL article is behind a paywall. Here is the free arXiv version arxiv.org/abs/1104.4635
Jun 16, 2011 at 11:57 history edited metzgeer CC BY-SA 3.0
added 1192 characters in body; edited title
Jun 16, 2011 at 4:11 history edited David Z CC BY-SA 3.0
fix latex and list formatting
Jun 16, 2011 at 3:24 history tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackPhysics/status/81200450401083392
Jun 16, 2011 at 3:13 answer added wsc timeline score: 5
Jun 16, 2011 at 2:06 history edited metzgeer CC BY-SA 3.0
deleted 4 characters in body
Jun 16, 2011 at 2:00 history asked metzgeer CC BY-SA 3.0