Timeline for If time isn't continuous, what is the best-known upper bound on the length of time intervals?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2014 at 21:34 | comment | added | Melquíades | @Peter Horvath I was talking about the Higgs decay rate and not about its mass. The mass of the Higgs is around 126 GeV, but its width is around 5 MeV in the Standard Model. | |
| Jun 17, 2014 at 17:25 | comment | added | peterh | @Melquíades What are you thinking, on this 5MeV? The Higgs mass is much bigger, around 130 GeV. | |
| Apr 28, 2014 at 22:02 | comment | added | Melquíades | If your argument holds, then the Higgs decay rate could give us also some information. The SM prediction is around $5\,\rm{MeV}$ and maybe this will be measured at the LHC or the ILC. | |
| S Apr 28, 2014 at 22:01 | history | suggested | Melquíades | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
improved formatting
|
| Apr 28, 2014 at 22:00 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Apr 28, 2014 at 22:01 | |||||
| Apr 28, 2014 at 21:05 | comment | added | Davidmh | From the line profile you can probably use Nyquist-Shannon Theorem to get an even lower estimation of the discreteness. | |
| Apr 28, 2014 at 20:49 | history | edited | DavePhD | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 18 characters in body
|
| Apr 28, 2014 at 18:46 | history | edited | DavePhD | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 72 characters in body
|
| Apr 28, 2014 at 18:39 | history | answered | DavePhD | CC BY-SA 3.0 |