Timeline for Decay/Counts/Number of Nuclei
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apr 29, 2014 at 3:03 | vote | accept | DWade64 | ||
Apr 28, 2014 at 18:35 | answer | added | David Z | timeline score: 1 | |
Apr 28, 2014 at 18:26 | comment | added | David Z | @DWade64 I'd suggest editing the question to reflect that, as it's important information. | |
Apr 28, 2014 at 5:18 | comment | added | DWade64 | @DavidZ $C$ is the number of counts in a short time interval. We made like 900 different recordings. Each recording was like 4 seconds. | |
Apr 28, 2014 at 0:25 | comment | added | David Z | Is your measurement $C$ the total number of counts accumulated since the beginning of the experiment, or is it the number of counts in a short time interval (like counts per second, for example)? | |
Apr 27, 2014 at 23:46 | history | edited | DWade64 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
Apr 27, 2014 at 23:19 | history | edited | dmckee --- ex-moderator kitten |
edited tags
|
|
Apr 27, 2014 at 23:17 | comment | added | dmckee --- ex-moderator kitten | Note also that $N = N_0 e^{-\lambda t}$ is all decays (at all angles), the decays seen by your device will actually be $N = \ell \epsilon A (N_0 e^{-\lambda t})$ where $\ell$ is live time (very nearly 1.0), $\epsilon$ is the quantum efficiency of your detector (probably also near 1), and $A$ is acceptance (a number expressing what fraction of decay gammas actually hit the detector). But all those corrections are effectively constant, so they don't affect your measured lifetime. | |
Apr 27, 2014 at 22:44 | comment | added | rob♦ | The count rate $C$ is directly proportional to the number of emitters $N$ remaining in the sample. | |
Apr 27, 2014 at 22:35 | history | asked | DWade64 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |