Timeline for Does centrifugal force exist?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Apr 23, 2014 at 11:14 | history | suggested | Charles Goodwin | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Improve English/grammar
|
| Apr 23, 2014 at 11:03 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Apr 23, 2014 at 11:14 | |||||
| Apr 22, 2014 at 19:43 | comment | added | Ruslan | Well, gravity is fictitious only in general relativity, not in Newtonian mechanics. | |
| S Apr 22, 2014 at 18:44 | history | suggested | gilly3 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Links, formatting, spelling, punctuation
|
| Apr 22, 2014 at 18:41 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Apr 22, 2014 at 18:44 | |||||
| Apr 22, 2014 at 17:19 | comment | added | Tristan | To be technically correct (which is the best kind of correct), even if the earth were at rest, an earth-based frame of reference is not inertial, as it contains gravity as a fictitious force. | |
| Apr 22, 2014 at 16:57 | comment | added | Dominic Hofer | You are technically totally correct ;-) So for the sake of completeness, let's assume the mother's ground is at rest. | |
| Apr 22, 2014 at 16:55 | review | First posts | |||
| Apr 22, 2014 at 17:00 | |||||
| Apr 22, 2014 at 16:51 | comment | added | Steve Jessop | "Where the ground, your mother stands on, is" -- well it isn't, but it's a lot less non-inertial since it's doing a lot fewer revolutions per day :-) | |
| Apr 22, 2014 at 16:36 | history | answered | Dominic Hofer | CC BY-SA 3.0 |