Timeline for Why is the divergence of a magnetic field equal to zero?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 8, 2016 at 19:09 | history | protected | Qmechanic♦ | ||
| Mar 8, 2016 at 19:08 | comment | added | DanielSank | I'm fairly sure that $\nabla \cdot B = 0$ is actually not strictly necessary in electromagnetic theory. I think the whole thing works ok if you drop that requirement, but then have a slightly weaker requirement about the ratio of the magnet and electric field divergences being a fixed constant. | |
| Apr 15, 2014 at 8:16 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackPhysics/status/455983077177974784 | ||
| Apr 13, 2014 at 20:39 | vote | accept | avm | ||
| Apr 13, 2014 at 14:55 | answer | added | Tea is life | timeline score: 9 | |
| Apr 13, 2014 at 14:52 | answer | added | Edward Hughes | timeline score: 22 | |
| Apr 13, 2014 at 14:34 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 54 characters in body; edited tags
|
| S Apr 13, 2014 at 13:55 | history | suggested | Hunter | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Edited the tags
|
| Apr 13, 2014 at 13:55 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Apr 13, 2014 at 13:55 | |||||
| S Apr 13, 2014 at 13:53 | history | suggested | JamalS | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Improved latex
|
| Apr 13, 2014 at 13:50 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Apr 13, 2014 at 13:53 | |||||
| Apr 13, 2014 at 13:48 | history | asked | avm | CC BY-SA 3.0 |