Timeline for What does the ordering of creation/annihilation operators mean?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 6, 2011 at 9:44 | history | edited | Vladimir Kalitvianski | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 8 characters in body
|
| Jun 6, 2011 at 9:21 | history | edited | Vladimir Kalitvianski | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 229 characters in body
|
| Jun 6, 2011 at 8:49 | comment | added | Vladimir Kalitvianski | No, it has nothing to do with details of interactions. It is just about how we technically change the populations of states. As I said, only the whole expression makes sense, not the order of particular operators, not the color of inks we use. | |
| Jun 5, 2011 at 22:44 | comment | added | Will Vousden | I understand that they describe transitions of particles, but this to me doesn't suggest that the order of the transitions should make any difference, or indeed what that should even mean in the absence of time. Is it to do with the details of the interactions? | |
| Jun 5, 2011 at 22:32 | history | edited | Vladimir Kalitvianski | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 57 characters in body
|
| Jun 5, 2011 at 22:18 | history | answered | Vladimir Kalitvianski | CC BY-SA 3.0 |