Timeline for Why do we require manifolds to be a topological space?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mar 31, 2014 at 0:33 | vote | accept | Hunter | ||
Mar 31, 2014 at 2:09 | |||||
Mar 31, 2014 at 0:30 | comment | added | Robin Ekman | Actually in physics we usually require diffeomorphism, because we want to talk about derivatives. So we require that the change-of-coordinate functions are smooth. Then we define $f : M\to \mathbb R$ to be smooth if $f \circ \varphi^{-1}$ is smooth. Here $\varphi : M \to \mathbb R^n$ is a coordinate function. A diffeomorphism is a homeomorpism that is smooth. With this definition the manifold becomes locally diffeomorphic to Euclidean space. Note that we had to define what it means to be differentiable on a manifold using the coordinate functions. | |
Mar 31, 2014 at 0:13 | comment | added | Hunter | Ok, thanks, that makes sense. In physics we (always?) assume that the manifolds we are working with have a homeomorphism from the $U_i$ to $\mathbb{R}^n$. Are there also physical theories that don't have this condition? What would happen to, say, general relativity if the spaces are diffeomorphic to each other, instead of homeomorphic? | |
Mar 31, 2014 at 0:08 | history | answered | Robin Ekman | CC BY-SA 3.0 |