Timeline for Is radioactive decay spontaneous or random?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 5, 2018 at 16:10 | answer | added | Aaliyan haider | timeline score: -2 | |
| Oct 9, 2017 at 16:20 | history | edited | AccidentalFourierTransform | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 1 character in body; edited tags
|
| Oct 9, 2017 at 15:49 | answer | added | walle | timeline score: 0 | |
| Apr 29, 2016 at 7:37 | answer | added | user115843 | timeline score: 0 | |
| Apr 9, 2016 at 10:57 | comment | added | user113855 | Spontaneous means it is unaffected by temperature, pressure e.t.c | |
| May 19, 2014 at 15:43 | comment | added | Martin Beckett | I think you are a victim of the "learn the precise phrase in the textbook and repeat it" school of education. Sorry to hear that it has spread outside the USA | |
| May 10, 2014 at 18:16 | vote | accept | Asad Moosvi | ||
| Mar 25, 2014 at 20:14 | answer | added | BMS | timeline score: 13 | |
| Mar 25, 2014 at 20:13 | comment | added | Kvothe | When you randomly scatter points on a surface or volume, you'll get a lot of variation in local point density. I'm assuming something similar (random events result in relative large differences) happens there as well. | |
| Mar 25, 2014 at 20:13 | comment | added | Asad Moosvi | Where in the entry does it explain the difference? | |
| Mar 25, 2014 at 20:11 | comment | added | BMS | The introductory Wikipedia entry on Radioactive decay touches on these two terms. | |
| Mar 25, 2014 at 20:08 | history | asked | Asad Moosvi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |