Timeline for The formula used to calculate electrical potential energy
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apr 6, 2014 at 13:34 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 105 characters in body; edited tags; edited title
|
S Mar 20, 2014 at 8:20 | history | suggested | JamalS | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Improved LateX
|
Mar 20, 2014 at 8:13 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Mar 20, 2014 at 8:20 | |||||
Mar 20, 2014 at 8:00 | answer | added | user42733 | timeline score: 1 | |
Mar 20, 2014 at 4:57 | comment | added | dmckee --- ex-moderator kitten | People often use "differential path element" or "infinitesimal path element" for $\mathrm{d}\vec{l}$, and also sometimes drop the "element". | |
Mar 20, 2014 at 4:52 | comment | added | aukxn | so the the work here is the sum of all dot products of the $\vec E$ and the Infinitesimal "distance" (sorry I don't know what word to describe $\vec {dl}$) at all point on the path the charge take to move from A to B. That means it is $\vec E \vec {dl}$. It is hard to get the full detailed formula of Work. | |
Mar 20, 2014 at 4:43 | comment | added | jerk_dadt | You are missing a dot product. This throws in a cosine of the angle between the electric field and your direction vector. This will make it that your integral is really are only summing the amount of the electric field in the direction of integration. Try googling line integrals for more info. | |
Mar 20, 2014 at 4:35 | history | asked | aukxn | CC BY-SA 3.0 |