Skip to main content
Tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackPhysics/status/440663415816978432
added 1 characters in body; edited tags; edited title
Source Link
Qmechanic
  • 212.7k
  • 48
  • 589
  • 2.3k

Path integral as a functional determinatedeterminant

In Peskin and Schroeder on pg. 304, the authors call the fermionic path integral: \begin{equation} \int {\cal D} \bar{\psi} {\cal D} \psi \exp \left[ i \int \,d^4x \bar{\psi} ( i \gamma_\mu D^\mu - m ) \psi \right] \end{equation} a functional determinatedeterminant, \begin{equation} \det \left( i \gamma_\mu D^\mu - m \right) \end{equation}\begin{equation} \det \left( i \gamma_\mu D^\mu - m \right). \end{equation} I've never heard this way of thinking about it. Why would the generating functional be a functional determinatedeterminant?

Path integral as a functional determinate

In Peskin and Schroeder on pg. 304, the authors call the fermionic path integral: \begin{equation} \int {\cal D} \bar{\psi} {\cal D} \psi \exp \left[ i \int \,d^4x \bar{\psi} ( i \gamma_\mu D^\mu - m ) \psi \right] \end{equation} a functional determinate, \begin{equation} \det \left( i \gamma_\mu D^\mu - m \right) \end{equation} I've never heard this way of thinking about it. Why would the generating functional be a functional determinate?

Path integral as a functional determinant

In Peskin and Schroeder on pg. 304, the authors call the fermionic path integral: \begin{equation} \int {\cal D} \bar{\psi} {\cal D} \psi \exp \left[ i \int \,d^4x \bar{\psi} ( i \gamma_\mu D^\mu - m ) \psi \right] \end{equation} a functional determinant, \begin{equation} \det \left( i \gamma_\mu D^\mu - m \right). \end{equation} I've never heard this way of thinking about it. Why would the generating functional be a functional determinant?

Source Link
JeffDror
  • 9k
  • 2
  • 30
  • 73

Path integral as a functional determinate

In Peskin and Schroeder on pg. 304, the authors call the fermionic path integral: \begin{equation} \int {\cal D} \bar{\psi} {\cal D} \psi \exp \left[ i \int \,d^4x \bar{\psi} ( i \gamma_\mu D^\mu - m ) \psi \right] \end{equation} a functional determinate, \begin{equation} \det \left( i \gamma_\mu D^\mu - m \right) \end{equation} I've never heard this way of thinking about it. Why would the generating functional be a functional determinate?