Timeline for Terminology for line integral of magnetic field
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 2018 at 18:50 | history | edited | Toby Bartels | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
quotation marks
|
| Mar 4, 2014 at 3:56 | history | edited | Toby Bartels | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
(Well, I'm having a little trouble getting the sign straight, but one way or the other it should work!)
|
| Mar 4, 2014 at 3:37 | comment | added | Toby Bartels |
Would it be appropriate to create the tag magnetic-circuits and add it to this question? That seems to be the name of the relevant topic. (Not that I could create it, since I don't have enough reputation on this StackExchange.)
|
|
| Mar 3, 2014 at 23:04 | history | edited | Toby Bartels | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
A theoretical way to measure this quantity.
|
| Mar 3, 2014 at 22:37 | answer | added | Toby Bartels | timeline score: 0 | |
| Mar 3, 2014 at 22:32 | vote | accept | Toby Bartels | ||
| Mar 3, 2014 at 22:29 | comment | added | Toby Bartels | The term ‘electromotive force’ is used on Wikipeda for this line integral, citing ‘David M. Cook (2003). The Theory of the Electromagnetic Field. Courier Dover. p. 157. ISBN 978-0-486-42567-2’ (which I have not looked at). In light of Tobias's answer below, perhaps ‘voltage drop’ would be a better term. | |
| Mar 3, 2014 at 8:13 | answer | added | Tobias | timeline score: 2 | |
| Mar 1, 2014 at 9:50 | review | First posts | |||
| Mar 1, 2014 at 10:01 | |||||
| Mar 1, 2014 at 9:44 | comment | added | Ján Lalinský | "Of course, the term for the line integral of the electric field (electromotive force) is somewhat of a historical oddity" and misleading - electromotive force isn't always given by line integral of the electric field. "Contour integral of electric/magnetic field" is accurate and comprehensible. I do not think there is commonly used shorter expression. | |
| Mar 1, 2014 at 9:31 | history | asked | Toby Bartels | CC BY-SA 3.0 |