2
$\begingroup$

In canonical transformations, how come we allow hamiltonian to change by a partial derivative of time? $$H'(P, Q, t) = H(p, q, t) + \frac{\partial F}{\partial t}.$$ Here $F$ is the generating function.

I mean geometrically that is not how a function should be transformed when there is a change of variables. Geometrically it should be $$H'(P, Q, t) = H(p, q, t).$$ In Lagrangian mechanics it is indeed so $$L'(Q, \dot{Q}, T) = L(q, \dot{q}, t).$$

$\endgroup$

2 Answers 2

3
$\begingroup$

In a canonical transformation, the new hamiltonian could have nothing to do with the initial hamiltonian, it just have to preserve Hamilton's equations. So in the new variables $(Q,P,t)$ you have to have that

$$\dot{Q} = \frac{\partial K}{\partial P} \qquad \dot{P} = -\frac{\partial K}{\partial Q}$$

where $K$ is the new Hamiltonian. Whenever this happens

$$K(Q,P,t) = H(q(Q,P),p(Q,P),t)$$

we call the transformation completely canonical (with the added bonus that the transformation is time independent), and it's a particular type of canonical transformation.

$\endgroup$
3
$\begingroup$

A more geometric approach is to consider the $(2n+1)$-dimensional contact manifold ${\cal M}$ with coordinates $(q^i,p_j,t)$. The Hamiltonian action functional is $$S_H[\gamma]~=~\int_I \gamma^{\ast} \Theta, \qquad \Theta~=~p_j \mathrm{d}q^j -H \mathrm{d}t, \tag{1}$$ where $\gamma:I\to {\cal M}$ is a curve. This action formulation (1) is world-line (WL) reparametrization invariant. Let us for simplicity work in the static gauge $\gamma^0(t)=t$. The Euler-Lagrange (EL) equations (i.e Hamilton's equations) remain the same if we change the contact 1-form $\Theta$ by an exact 1-form $$ P_j \mathrm{d}Q^j -K\mathrm{d}t ~=~ \Theta^{\prime}~=~\Theta- \mathrm{d}F.\tag{2}$$ From this geometric perspective, the transform law $$ K~=~H + \frac{\partial F}{\partial t} \tag{3}$$ is just the standard way how the $t$-component $\Theta_t=-H$ of the contact 1-form $\Theta$ transforms under a change by an exact 1-form (given various other restrictions on the transformation).

References:

  1. S. G. Rajeev, A Hamilton-Jacobi Formalism for Thermodynamics, Annals. Phys. 323 (2008) 2265, arXiv:0711.4319.

  2. H. Geiges, An introduction to contact topology, 2008. (A pdf file of lecture notes from 2004 can be found on the author's webpage.)

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ Where could I find more informations about this formulation? I've never seen this more formal approach $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 17, 2020 at 8:01
  • $\begingroup$ Yeah, it's rare that textbooks give it much space. Here is a related MO post for a start. $\endgroup$
    – Qmechanic
    Commented Apr 17, 2020 at 8:27
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you very much! $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 17, 2020 at 8:48

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.