11
$\begingroup$

I'm having a hard time understanding how changing space means changing time. In books I've read people are saying "space and time" or "space-time" but never explain what the difference is between the two concepts or how they are related.

How are the concepts of space, time, and space-time related?

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ I'm afraid that there are a lot of questions here. Maybe - you could prefer a search: physics.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/… $\endgroup$ Dec 6, 2012 at 18:07
  • $\begingroup$ Indeed, what do you mean by "changing space"? If you're simply looking for a primer on the idea of spacetime, then: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spacetime $\endgroup$ Dec 6, 2012 at 18:16
  • $\begingroup$ Difference between "space and time" and "space-time" is basically of symmetry. When we deal with space and time as different objects then transformations which mix time coordinates with spatial ones are not allowed. On the other hand if we consider space-time as one thing then such transformations too are allowed and hence symmetry group is bigger. $\endgroup$
    – user10001
    Dec 6, 2012 at 18:18
  • $\begingroup$ Maybe what i meant by changing space was if i move from location A to B how does that even affect time? $\endgroup$
    – Hobbs
    Dec 6, 2012 at 19:23

2 Answers 2

19
$\begingroup$

Suppose you move a small distance $\vec{dr}$ = ($dx$, $dy$, $dz$) and you take a time $dt$ to do it. Pre-special relativity you could say three things. Firstly the distance moved is given by:

$$ dr^2 = dx^2 + dy^2 + dz^2 $$

(i.e. just Pythagorus' theorem) and secondly the time $dt$ was not related to the distance i.e. you could move at any velocity. Lastly the quantities $dr$ and $dt$ are invarients, that is all observers will agree they have the same value.

Special relativity differs by saying that $dr$ and $dt$ are no longer invarients if you take them separately. Instead the only invarient is the proper time, $d\tau$, defined by:

$$ c^2d\tau^2 = c^2dt^2 - dx^2 - dy^2 - dz^2 $$

In special relativity all observers will agree that $d\tau$ has the same value, but they will not agree on the values of $dt$, $dx$, $dy$ and $dz$.

This is why we have to talk about spacetime rather than space and time. The only way to construct laws that apply to everyone is to combine space and time into a single equation.

You say:

I'm having a hard time understanding how changing space means changing time

Well suppose we try to do this. Let's change space by moving a distance ($dx$, $dy$, $dz$) but not change time i.e. $dt$ = 0. If we use the equation above to calculate the proper time, $d\tau$, we get:

$$ d\tau^2 = \frac{0 - dx^2 - dy^2 - dz^2}{c^2} $$

Do you see the problem? $d\tau^2$ is going to be negative so $d\tau$ is imaginary and has no physical meaning. That means we can't move in zero time. Well what is the smallest time $dt$ that we need to take to move ($dx$, $dy$, $dz$)? The smallest value of $dt$ that gives a non-negative value of $d\tau^2$ is when $d\tau^2$ = 0 so:

$$ c^2d\tau^2 = 0 = c^2dt^2 - dx^2 - dy^2 - dz^2 $$

or:

$$ dt^2 = \frac{dx^2 + dy^2 + dz^2}{c^2} $$

If we've moved a distance $dr = \sqrt{dx^2 + dy^2 + dz^2}$ in a time $dt$, the we can find the velocity we've moved at the dividing $dr$ by $dt$, and if we do this we find:

$$ v^2 = \frac{dr^2}{dt^2} = \frac{dx^2 + dy^2 + dz^2}{\frac{dx^2 + dy^2 + dz^2}{c^2}} = c^2 $$

So we find that the maximum possible speed is $v = c$, or in other words we can't move faster than the speed of light. And all from that one equation combining the space and time co-ordinates into the proper time!

$\endgroup$
12
$\begingroup$

The difference between space and time is rooted in causality, i.e., the experimanetal fact that the future can be influenced.

More precisely, in nonrelativistic physics: Things at different spatial positions at the same time can be independently manipulated without influencing each other. Things at different times at the same position usually cannot, as the prior event influences the later.

In relativistic physics, this still holds in any reference frame of an observer.

$\endgroup$

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.