1,692 reputation
516
bio website unige.ch/math/folks/velenik
location Geneva, Switzerland
age 44
visits member for 2 years, 11 months
seen 10 hours ago

Professor at the Mathematics department of the University of Geneva. Mostly working at the intersection of probability theory and statistical physics.

With a colleague, we are in the process of writing an introductory book on the (classical) equilibrium statistical physics of lattice spin systems, from a mathematically rigorous point of view. A more detailed description of the project, as well as early drafts of several chapters can be found here. Your feedback would be more than welcome!


11h
comment How to understand singularities in physics?
Not sure about your second part. Phase transitions are defined as singularities of thermodynamic potentials, because this is what one seems to observe experimentally. Statistical mechanics then tells you that these singularities are in fact only approximate (they only exist in the ideal limit of infinite systems). The "real" functions remain smooth, although they mimic very closely singular behaviour.
Mar
7
comment Phase Transition at Zero Temperature (Not QPT)
I still don't see what you mean. In the 1d Ising model, the thermal fluctuations restore the symmetry which is broken at $T=0$ (the model is symmetric whenever $T\neq 0$, but is not symmetric when $T=0$). This is the opposite of what you seem to say.
Mar
6
comment Phase Transition at Zero Temperature (Not QPT)
I am not sure I understand your analogy: in the 1d Ising model, $T=0$ is the only temperature at which the symmetry is broken. In any case, this is of course extremely general: the same will be true (at the classical level) for any one-dimensional model with compact spins, and periodic interactions. This, of course, includes models with continuous symmetry (the one-dimensional $O(N)$-models, for example).
Jan
15
answered Correlation length in d>1 Ising model, at zero temperature
Jan
2
comment Why are large scale structures isotropic in the Ising model?
Note that the latter result has been only proved in dimension $2$, and there it results from the fact that surface tension becomes isotropic in this limit, for very much the same reason the 2d random walk converges to Brownian motion.
Jan
2
comment Why are large scale structures isotropic in the Ising model?
What do you mean by "the phase separated 'blob' pattern that forms when the Ising model is quenched"? Do you mean the shape of the droplet of one phase immersed inside the other, when the magnetization is fixed at a value between $m^*$ and $-m^*$? If yes, then this shape is not rotation invariant, since the surface tension is not and the shape is obtained by the Wulff construction. It is true, however, that (properly rescaled) this shape converges to a disk as $\beta\downarrow\beta_c$.
Dec
29
comment What is the central charge of the disordered $q$-state Potts model, for large $q$?
The phase transition of the Potts model is first-order for $q\geq 5$ (in two dimensions), there is no critical point.
Nov
26
comment Why doesn't the 1 dimensional ising model have a transition temperature?
I should also mention that a precise discussion of the relation between the local behavior of finite and infinite two-dimensional Ising models is given in Section 3.8.6. It requires some terminology, but the latter is explained earlier in the chapter.
Nov
26
comment Why doesn't the 1 dimensional ising model have a transition temperature?
You might also have a look at Figure 1.11 in this book in progress. It shows the behavior of the magnetization in the 2d Ising model for increasing system sizes (including the infinite system). You can see that the curve is smooth for finite systems, but nevertheless approximate better and better the non-smooth one you get in the thermodynamic limit. BTW, the one-dimensional Ising model is discussed there in Section 3.3.
Nov
26
comment Why doesn't the 1 dimensional ising model have a transition temperature?
I can guarantee you that it is perfectly sound. Just look at your free energy: at finite $N$, it is an analytic function of the temperature (more generally, the partition function is just a polynomial in $e^{-\beta}$ with nonnegative real coefficients, so its logarithm is real-analytic)! The only way you can generate non-analyticities is in the thermodynamic limit. This is a general fact. Of course, "real" phase transitions (i.e., for infinite systems) are well approximated by the behavior of large finite systems, which is why you can observe (apparent) singular behavior in finite systems too.
Nov
25
comment Why doesn't the 1 dimensional ising model have a transition temperature?
Phase transitions (in the sense of nonanalyticities of thermodynamic potentials) can only exist in the thermodynamic limit. So, you have to fix $T>0$ and consider what happens in the limit $N\to\infty$. Note also that, for any finite $N$, typical samples will be perfectly ordered (i.e., magnetization equal to $1$) with very high probability provided you take the temperature sufficiently low, but this is just a finite-size effect, which disappears in the thermodynamic limit.
Oct
6
answered How to calculate critical temperature of the Ising model?
Sep
30
answered Ising model on lattices with (vertical side length) $\neq$ (horizontal side length)
Sep
26
revised Does the q-states Potts become the XY model in large q state?
added 86 characters in body
Sep
26
revised Does the q-states Potts become the XY model in large q state?
Added a precision
Sep
26
answered Does the q-states Potts become the XY model in large q state?
Sep
16
comment MIcrocanonical and Canonical - The thermodynamic limit
You need to fix the total energy in your microcanonical computation.
Aug
30
comment Axioms behind entropy!
No. The approach is extremely general (much more so than previous ones). Concerning phase transitions, read the few lines just after the statement of the theorem you quote.
Aug
30
answered Axioms behind entropy!
Aug
29
comment Can an Ergodic dynamical system approach equilibrium?
I am not sure I understand your concern. I assume that your dynamical system is measure-preserving (as is the relevant setting for application to stat. mech.). In that case, it is clear that the system does not "spend its future time in a smaller region of the phase space", at least not as measured with $\mu$. Maybe you'd enjoy reading this very nice paper, which although not discussing specifically the issue you have, might well clarify things for you.