meta user
network profile
| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | India | |
| age | 22 | |
| visits | member for | 1 year, 1 month |
| seen | May 6 at 21:32 | |
| stats | profile views | 83 |
Interested in theoretical physics, mathematics, literature, languages and philosophy.
|
Apr 28 |
comment |
Perturbation in Supersymmetric Quantum Mechanics. @LubošMotl : Sir, do you mean if I expand $Q$ perturbatively in $\lambda$, and determine ground state upto some order 'n',and then take the Hamiltonian upto that order, and find that expectation value is zero. I understand that I can find uniquely the ground state by demanding it to be annihilated by Q, therefore the above result should hold true. I was just curious if I would be able to show it in various orders of perturbation. |
|
Apr 28 |
asked | Perturbation in Supersymmetric Quantum Mechanics. |
|
Apr 3 |
awarded | Yearling |
|
Mar 27 |
accepted | From Lagrangian to Hamiltonian in Fermionic Model |
|
Mar 27 |
comment |
From Lagrangian to Hamiltonian in Fermionic Model Sorry for the sloppy way of posting the question. I think I was in a haste while doing so, actually Lagrangian does have a summation over all the indices. |
|
Mar 25 |
asked | From Lagrangian to Hamiltonian in Fermionic Model |
|
Feb 5 |
answered | What grounds the difference between space and time? |
|
Feb 1 |
asked | Supersymmetric Sigma Model |
|
Dec 20 |
accepted | Supersymmetry in Quantum Mechanics |
|
Nov 22 |
comment |
Constructing Supersymmetric Lagrangians Lorentz-Invariance has to do with space-time symmetries, how come fermionic terms affect it ? The anti-symmetric property of fermions is within it's own algebra. |
|
Nov 22 |
asked | Constructing Supersymmetric Lagrangians |
|
Nov 16 |
accepted | More than one time dimension |
|
Nov 7 |
asked | More than one time dimension |
|
Oct 31 |
asked | Ultracold atoms and General theory of Relativty |
|
Oct 17 |
awarded | Editor |
|
Oct 17 |
revised |
Entanglement Entropy deleted 163 characters in body |
|
Oct 16 |
awarded | Commentator |
|
Oct 16 |
comment |
Entanglement Entropy @genneth : I meant that it introduces stuff without asking much prerequisites of many body physics. Is it not possible to learn the subject without the knowledge of many body physics ? |
|
Oct 16 |
comment |
Entanglement Entropy I am preparing for a presentation on "Entanglement Entropy from Condensed Matter Physics to Black Holes" hence I was looking for useful resources. |
|
Oct 16 |
comment |
Entanglement Entropy I mean that which is based on the basic quantum mechanics and advanced quantum mechanics, and doesn't involve much of many body theory and quantum field theory |
