meta user
network profile
| bio | website | sites.google.com/site/… |
|---|---|---|
| location | Mars | |
| age | 15 | |
| visits | member for | 1 year, 6 months |
| seen | Apr 16 at 19:17 | |
| stats | profile views | 18 |
I am a high-school freshman who is looking at a career in programming or maybe mathematics research. I am an ex-java Rubyist, who has recently decided to move up onto C++. W00T!
I am very into math. I have been dabbling my way into calculus, and I love it :)
|
Dec 7 |
awarded | Caucus |
|
Dec 7 |
awarded | Constituent |
|
Dec 7 |
revised |
How can Sub-Atomic Particles be Visualized? changed the title to a more fitting question |
|
Dec 7 |
suggested | suggested edit on How can Sub-Atomic Particles be Visualized? |
|
Dec 7 |
suggested | suggested edit on System with no entanglement but consuming quantum discord |
|
Dec 7 |
awarded | Teacher |
|
Dec 7 |
awarded | Scholar |
|
Dec 7 |
accepted | Crucial Misconceptions about The Universe |
|
Dec 7 |
comment |
Crucial Misconceptions about The Universe @namehere Understood, thanks :) |
|
Dec 7 |
comment |
Crucial Misconceptions about The Universe @namehere I mean that the radiation emitted would be infinite, because if the universe were infinite, then an infinite number of stars would be emitting an infinite amount of radiation |
|
Dec 7 |
comment |
Crucial Misconceptions about The Universe Alrighty, thank you :) |
|
Dec 7 |
comment |
Crucial Misconceptions about The Universe @jcohen79 Theoretically (<keyword), the stars of the universe would be giving off a lot more radiation if the universe was infinite, which would be a much better way to say what I was meaning to |
|
Dec 7 |
revised |
Crucial Misconceptions about The Universe Changed part of it for clarification |
|
Dec 7 |
comment |
Crucial Misconceptions about The Universe @namehere Up to you |
|
Dec 7 |
awarded | Student |
|
Dec 7 |
comment |
Crucial Misconceptions about The Universe Ah, okay, see I have just been reading A Brief History of Time at late times during the night, so I may have misunderstood things :P |
|
Dec 7 |
comment |
Crucial Misconceptions about The Universe @namehere Why don't you put those in an answer? ;) |
|
Dec 7 |
comment |
Crucial Misconceptions about The Universe Ah, those both make sense. As I understand it, the "big bang" was just a colliding of particles and antiparticles (and sub-atomics and anti-sub-atomics), of which there were an equal number, but they had enough energy to change into other things, right? |
|
Dec 7 |
asked | Crucial Misconceptions about The Universe |
|
Dec 7 |
awarded | Supporter |
