|
Dec 15 |
comment |
Light vs neutrino speed comparison in a real tunnel There is_no_way an international collaboration with 200 physicists is hiding anything. I am saying that not because that with so many people someone would leak something, but because in science you do not hide things. One man can be corrupt and hide everything. An international collaboration plays by the rules of established science. You don't just pull their funding because of one man who has not read all the publications. |
|
Dec 15 |
comment |
Light vs neutrino speed comparison in a real tunnel Why do you believe that OPERA is hiding something. |
|
Dec 11 |
comment |
Would a generator in vacuum/space provide electricity endlessly? @AdamRedwine: Lenz's law only gives the direction of the force in Faraday's law. |
|
Dec 3 |
comment |
In general what will holding an anti-hydrogen atom for more than a 1/10th of second allow scientists to discover? @Chad Orzel: Can you find a reference for trapped antihydrogen gravity experiment. I believe that you are mistaken - all gravity experiments needs to be made in flight because of the weakness of gravity compared to the electromagnetic trapping forces. |
|
Nov 30 |
awarded | Commentator |
|
Nov 30 |
comment |
units and nature Again - I do not care about the scale of the units. It makes no difference. - And setting a unit equal to one does not makes it disappear, it is only done because it makes the notation easier in certain fields of physics. |
|
Nov 30 |
comment |
units and nature I do not arrive at any number - that is what I am asking for. The number five is just the five units from the natural units - length, time, mass, electric charge and temperature. |
|
Nov 28 |
comment |
units and nature Notice that my question is about dimensionallity, and not about the units themselves - I do not care weather they are based on universal physical constants, or man made artifacts. |
|
Nov 28 |
awarded | Critic |
|
Nov 28 |
comment |
units and nature I think you misunderstood my question. I do not care about the units themselves(e.g. if it is the meter or Planck length unit used for length scale does not matter). |
|
Nov 28 |
comment |
units and nature By the natural unit system, I mean e.g. units for length, time, mass, electric charge, and temperature(or and other linear independent units spanning the same space). en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units |
|
Nov 28 |
awarded | Student |
|
Nov 28 |
asked | units and nature |
|
Nov 26 |
answered | Is there any true inertial reference frame in the universe? |
|
Nov 26 |
comment |
Is there any true inertial reference frame in the universe? I do not think that there are any scientists that claims that the earth is an inertial frame. They sure would be bad scientists. |
|
Nov 24 |
comment |
Does $E$ really equal $mc^2$? I do not agree the conversion idea is not idiotic. The fermions( half-integer spin particles) that obey the Fermi–Dirac statistics(and thereby seen as matter) is indeed converted into energy in an annihilation(the word itself also suggest the disappearance of the matter). |
|
Nov 24 |
comment |
Has anyone actually “seen” entanglement? There is nothing wrong with the wiki description. It really tells the same as FrankH, it does_not_suggest that information was send thousands of times faster than the speed of ligth. The effect(which is theoretically instantaneously) was measured experimentally to be at least this speed. |
|
Nov 10 |
answered | Why does it seem like a broken magnet's poles flip? |
|
Oct 26 |
answered | Does $E$ really equal $mc^2$? |
|
Oct 25 |
comment |
Clarification of equilibrium expression for upside down can in water The air pressure will act on all surfaces in all directions, giving a net force of zero. Other forces, and their directions are given from Archimedes law. |