| bio | website | keith-s-thompson.github.com |
|---|---|---|
| location | San Diego, CA | |
| age | 53 | |
| visits | member for | 1 year, 7 months |
| seen | May 9 at 14:35 | |
| stats | profile views | 191 |
I'm a programmer and all-around nerd living in San Diego, California and working at JetHead Development Inc.
E-mail: Keith.S.Thompson@gmail.com
|
Aug 4 |
awarded | Self-Learner |
|
Aug 3 |
comment |
Is it possible to lift yourself off from the ground? @Argus: Well, not for me. 8-)} |
|
Aug 2 |
comment |
Is it possible to lift yourself off from the ground? @Bernhard: Yes, and if you put your hands under your bottom and push down, you can lift yourself. The question, IMHO, is poorly phrased. |
|
Aug 2 |
comment |
Is it possible to lift yourself off from the ground? The question is ambiguous. If you push down against the ground, it's possible. If you try to pull up against your own body, it's not. |
|
Aug 2 |
comment |
Is it possible to lift yourself off from the ground? My father used to tell me about our mythical ancestor Bootstrap Thompson, the only man in the world who could pick himself up by his bootstraps and hold himself out at arm's length. |
|
Aug 1 |
comment |
What is the shortest run needed for a “dropped skateboard” rider to reach 160 mph? If he's skating in a vacuum, will he reach 160 mph before he asphyxiates? Feel free to assume a spherical skateboarder. |
|
Aug 1 |
comment |
The theory of moon creation when a Mars size planet hit Earth @zadane: Only if they're low enough to experience significant atmospheric drag. Manned satellites (the shuttle, ISS, Skylab, Mir, etc.) tend to be launched into as low an orbit as practical, because it's cheaper, and because you need minimal fuel to re-enter and go home; that's worth the expense of an occasional re-boost. GPS satellites orbit at about 20,000 kilometers, and geosynchronous communications satellites are about about 36,000 kilometers; they experience no significant drag, and their orbits are much more stable. |
|
Jul 31 |
comment |
The theory of moon creation when a Mars size planet hit Earth @JohnRennie: Sure, but in the views we've seen of the Enterprise in orbit it's clearly high enough for drag not to be an issue. The ISS is in low orbit so it's easy to get to from the surface; the Enterprise comes into orbit from deep space, so there's no reason for it to be in such a low orbit. |
|
Jul 31 |
comment |
The theory of moon creation when a Mars size planet hit Earth It's possible, but unlikely, that Earth's orbit was eccentric before the collision and nearly circular after. |
|
Jul 30 |
comment |
The theory of moon creation when a Mars size planet hit Earth @ThePopMachine: In the original Star Trek, the ship's orbit around a planet was often portrayed as unstable, requiring power to maintain it. That may actually be part of the reason for the misconception. |
|
Jul 30 |
comment |
The theory of moon creation when a Mars size planet hit Earth Do gravitational interactions with other planets tend to circularize orbits over time? |
|
Jul 30 |
answered | The theory of moon creation when a Mars size planet hit Earth |
|
Jul 28 |
comment |
Why are there photographs of nuclear tests? Yes, the atmosphere absorbs X-rays fairly well; that's why we put X-ray telescopes in orbit. |
|
Jul 25 |
comment |
Could cell-phone radiation cause cancer? And are studies that show a (small) negative correlation less likely to be published, introducing a positive bias? |
|
Jul 20 |
awarded | Enthusiast |
|
Jul 16 |
comment |
Why do we still not have an exact definition for a kilogram? But you didn't mention that in your answer. You merely stated that "One kilogram is a mass of a randomly chosen prototype." without saying why (which was the question). And again, I don't understand what you mean by "mass is not directly related to kilograms". |
|
Jul 16 |
comment |
Why do we still not have an exact definition for a kilogram? This doesn't answer the question. And perhaps you could explain what you mean by "mass is not directly related to kilograms". |
|
Jul 10 |
comment |
What do spacecraft have in common with atmospheric aeroplanes? @DmitryBrant: Sure, but the premise of the question was a craft that can operate both in an atmosphere and in deep space. Clearly a deep-space-only craft would likely be much different. |
|
Jul 10 |
revised |
What do spacecraft have in common with atmospheric aeroplanes? added 2384 characters in body |
|
Jul 8 |
comment |
What do spacecraft have in common with atmospheric aeroplanes? @DmitryBrant: True, but a craft that really is capable of operating in deep space and in the atmosphere would likely have a similar look. |