meta user
network profile
| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | ||
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 2 years, 7 months |
| seen | Jun 16 '11 at 20:40 | |
| stats | profile views | 91 |
|
Apr 1 |
awarded | Popular Question |
|
Mar 26 |
awarded | Popular Question |
|
Nov 19 |
awarded | Yearling |
|
Aug 30 |
awarded | Taxonomist |
|
Nov 19 |
awarded | Yearling |
|
May 29 |
accepted | Quantizing EM field |
|
May 28 |
asked | Quantizing EM field |
|
May 28 |
answered | The Orbiting Moon as a Quantum Object |
|
Mar 28 |
accepted | Internal Energy and entropy in a open system |
|
Mar 28 |
asked | Internal Energy and entropy in a open system |
|
Feb 24 |
accepted | Scalar product of coherent states |
|
Feb 24 |
accepted | BCS theory, Richardson model and Superconductivity |
|
Feb 24 |
comment |
Scalar product of coherent states @Luboš Motl @wsc Thank you for the help! |
|
Feb 24 |
comment |
Scalar product of coherent states @wsc So I'll obtain $e^{-\frac{|\alpha|^2+|\beta|^2}{2}}e^{\hat\beta\alpha}$ ? |
|
Feb 24 |
asked | Scalar product of coherent states |
|
Feb 20 |
comment |
Quantization of Gravitational Field: Quantization conditions @Marek , sorry I haven't (yet) studied group theory. I can understand what are you saying because the scalar field has not elicity and polarizations, and a vectorial field has 3 components and I can connect to them 3 polarization and the field has elicity. but the electromagnetic field is a tensor too $F^{\mu\nu}$, we quantize the vectorial field potential $A^\mu$ don't we? And for a tensorial field like gravity what are elicities? |
|
Feb 20 |
revised |
Quantization of Gravitational Field: Quantization conditions edited tags |
|
Feb 20 |
revised |
Quantization of Gravitational Field: Quantization conditions edited tags; added 2 characters in body |
|
Feb 20 |
asked | Quantization of Gravitational Field: Quantization conditions |
|
Feb 16 |
comment |
Time evolution in quantum mechanics So you used Hadamard formula. Thank you. +1 |
