network profile
| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | ||
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 1 year, 7 months |
| seen | Jan 19 at 19:10 | |
| stats | profile views | 17 |
|
Aug 17 |
revised |
Tips on teaching Dimensional Analysis? added 920 characters in body |
|
Aug 16 |
asked | Tips on teaching Dimensional Analysis? |
|
Jul 18 |
awarded | Scholar |
|
Jul 18 |
accepted | understanding time: Is time simply the rate change? |
|
Oct 10 |
comment |
understanding time: Is time simply the rate change? to rephrase: is time a thing in itself or is time simply things changing? This is probably a hard question to articulate. Add that to my lack of understanding of physics :-) |
|
Oct 7 |
comment |
understanding time: Is time simply the rate change? +1 because this definitely doesn't deserve a -1 :-). You essentially rephrase my question in the first part. I could have rephrased as asking, "is it the case that time is simply causality?" If this is the case then it seems the notion of a "flow" of time only exists because we have a memory of the past events; when in fact there is no past, there is no future, there is only stuff which interacts. So the words "time", "causality" and "interaction" are interchangeable leaving us with only stuff that changes. |
|
Oct 7 |
awarded | Supporter |
|
Oct 7 |
comment |
understanding time: Is time simply the rate change? @sb1 nicely said, lol |
|
Oct 5 |
awarded | Student |
|
Oct 4 |
comment |
understanding time: Is time simply the rate change? Things may happen "faster" compared to things happening on earth now but wouldn't you eventually reach the beginning where nothing is happening and you reach a static/stable environment |
|
Oct 4 |
awarded | Editor |
|
Oct 4 |
revised |
understanding time: Is time simply the rate change? added 580 characters in body |
|
Oct 4 |
asked | understanding time: Is time simply the rate change? |
