meta user
network profile
| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | Germany | |
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 1 year, 7 months |
| seen | yesterday | |
| stats | profile views | 54 |
A PhD student in Germany. physics.reality@gmail.com
|
May 1 |
comment |
English translation of Helmholtz' paper: “On the Physical Significance of the Principle of Least Action” Looking at the contents of this book, it does not contain the paper in the question. |
|
Apr 21 |
accepted | First order coherence function in terms of momentum distribution function |
|
Apr 16 |
asked | First order coherence function in terms of momentum distribution function |
|
Apr 14 |
asked | English translation of Helmholtz' paper: “On the Physical Significance of the Principle of Least Action” |
|
Mar 24 |
awarded | Popular Question |
|
Mar 20 |
awarded | Yearling |
|
Mar 13 |
comment |
Hamiltonian of a simple graph $\Sigma_z=S_1^z+S_2^z$ The first matrix you wrote for $\Sigma_z$ is consistent with the definitions for$S_1^z$ and $S_2^z$. What is the problem in $S_1^z |ZZ\rangle=-0.5|ZZ\rangle$ ? Isn't this expected? |
|
Mar 10 |
answered | Hamiltonian of a simple graph |
|
Feb 12 |
comment |
Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) Conceptual Questions Are you having difficulty trying to visualize the time evolution of the magnetization? Try to use this simulator: drcmr.dk/BlochSimulator |
|
Jan 6 |
comment |
Simulating the evolution of a wavepacket through a crystal lattice @hwlau I am not an expert in either of them. For sufficiently small systems, direct evolution with a simple 4th order Runge Kutta algorithm is sufficient. This amounts to using a truncated Taylor expansion of the time evolution operator. The Hamiltonian is represented as a sparse matrix. |
|
Dec 31 |
comment |
Simulating the evolution of a wavepacket through a crystal lattice Have you thought of using numerical algorithms, such as tDMRG, TEBD ? |
|
Oct 26 |
awarded | Commentator |
|
Oct 26 |
comment |
What is the spin rotation operator for spin > 1/2? Of course I am asking about the analogous formula for the expansion of the exponential in terms of cosines and sines not about the spin matrix ! |
|
Oct 25 |
asked | What is the spin rotation operator for spin > 1/2? |
|
Oct 6 |
awarded | Benefactor |
|
Oct 6 |
accepted | Scale invariance symmetry as a simple argument in an electrostatics problem |
|
Oct 5 |
comment |
Scale invariance symmetry as a simple argument in an electrostatics problem This is a valid proof, but I doubt that it is the scale invariance symmetry meant by Prof. Preskill. He wrote: "Actually, this problem can also be solved by a symmetry argument, though the symmetry used is less obvious than rotational invariance. Readers may enjoy constructing this symmetry argument, which (in keeping with the theme of this post) I find more elegant than the argument using concentric rings suggested by your hint." Please read the discussion in the post in the question. |
|
Oct 4 |
awarded | Promoter |
|
Sep 29 |
asked | Scale invariance symmetry as a simple argument in an electrostatics problem |
|
Sep 12 |
comment |
Driving a solution of optical isomer molecules with the resonant frequency I am indeed interested in the simulation details of this. If you wish, you can send to [my email]. In order to understand the theory behind this, we should first know how the chiral states are stabilized in the first place. One famous stabilization mechanism is [decoherence] (prl.aps.org/abstract/PRL/v103/i2/e023202). It seems to me that the predictions of this paper can be tested based on the setup in the question. |
